polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Niclas Hedhman (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (POLYGENE-119) Investigate if MethodHandles and CallSites can benefit Polygene
Date Sun, 28 May 2017 16:36:04 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16027859#comment-16027859
] 

Niclas Hedhman commented on POLYGENE-119:
-----------------------------------------

NOTE: MethodHandles were used to implement support for interception of "default interface
methods".

> Investigate if MethodHandles and CallSites can benefit Polygene
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: POLYGENE-119
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POLYGENE-119
>             Project: Polygene
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Niclas Hedhman
>
> The introduction of invokedynamic at JVM level, also introduced support in the JDK to
leverage this.
> We should try to figure out if Reflection and Byte Code generation is still the best
option for Polygene. Perhaps these new features are more suitable.
> First task is to find a comprehensive explanation of what these things are, as the Javadocs
are incredibly hard to understand, as I think I am lacking some bigger picture explanation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message