Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E3B200BAB for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:01:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B3313160AEF; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0567F160ADF for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:01:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 88668 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2016 13:01:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@zest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@zest.apache.org Received: (qmail 88638 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2016 13:01:33 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:01:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 355711A00B2 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:01:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.78 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.78 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqyldNZsqRED for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:01:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com (mail-it0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id EB5795F1B3 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e187so49418811itc.1 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=Dtg4ykH8c+ZNQLAij7uZ+QMlpG2i3SSp+hwEovcwDKI=; b=N5GeqSgqJwva2FTAxKyWlmdZszA6H71uIQzhFeaUtQmwqj7ZUAmAj5VDuPqrJcG3Hc 9Whj1mpRUv1mNRBpEcSUoDpcCcUi/ujV0sJlaWOD5AenfX7i2ozyWZTnfl7A+MgjclQ9 1fs+KhHdq78WSrERf67f1umRfXmkARKduGPHlt7AzP8ZEdEIya+6htL5CsAv1Y4s4E5e CkIOdtgSTkhH/MQLGf+n88iQKmzQlexNK1gtcaN7hNJ0I636M+ueghhoDJ14kzXIB1Ks a/a8owYY4LBn6PtV6OEERhP6Q9nK4DKbZ3Xs5WOx/RDl7h4Q2D2m4IvORmimPbXwi6E0 eb9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Dtg4ykH8c+ZNQLAij7uZ+QMlpG2i3SSp+hwEovcwDKI=; b=P2YyIH3Rqlc+m2psp1rzhzdqqI514azOE/xZwvz4rqace//negWgHQooBCdYGBjCNQ rMSuORd0pibDsRdqlteA32C4/destJIKRw8TItVOKMsiG2Q4ohPBIDSb+4V5tDGDmZF2 FMKZO0RO0kEd2ni+pfJ+11A4REhZHDN1lZI6eUd9oGNuyBqpZNrzl3/YXapzidy2IqKL cwouXZy/au39UL/kOhj5iNxSf5WZNvOXHDn2lj/afQnlQz18kIpkQo4aN4f7VKFwWlsr 5fpnCqeCl9+UUNPwERW96u7InezaTKz+nnQO5qPcilc1eqJTON3b1dv50EXa7TQQo0zw tzeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RlwSenZEOhzI0yvfmk5V6tAJLhA9AIOWwhyKe6ca/G3+/CynZWIDsZB5n0XI63BUeejCOeAZQeub0rWsA== X-Received: by 10.202.78.205 with SMTP id c196mr14319919oib.158.1477141284039; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:01:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hedhman@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.170.78 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:01:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <580B5AA6.3000108@nosphere.org> References: <580A4B3A.1080700@nosphere.org> <580B5AA6.3000108@nosphere.org> From: Niclas Hedhman Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 21:01:03 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VNrCER9QfW9xacxom2jJ8au0zvA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Design flaw in EntityStore SPI? To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16b1884b200053f73c115 archived-at: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:01:39 -0000 --001a11c16b1884b200053f73c115 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Paul Merlin wrote: > It sounds like an interesting modeling facility and > does not feel so wrong to me. But adding the responsibility to do this > validation to ES may not be something we want to do. Yes, I think it is not realistic to do this for your stated reason, and I am dropping the idea for now. -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java --001a11c16b1884b200053f73c115--