Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zest-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zest-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7ADF3182A8 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:20:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6571 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 10:20:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zest-dev-archive@zest.apache.org Received: (qmail 6534 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 10:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@zest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@zest.apache.org Received: (qmail 6519 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2015 10:20:34 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:20:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4540C45C8 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:20:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.99 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VyqTE9El5_QO for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:20:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mail.kapsi.fi [217.30.184.167]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DC2D621157 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 31-47-67-188.customers.tamico.com ([31.47.67.188] helo=[10.3.10.216]) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a99C2-0004I3-Mb for dev@zest.apache.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:20:22 +0200 Subject: Re: @Concerns and @SideEffects on methods.... To: dev@zest.apache.org References: Reply-To: stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi From: Stanislav Muhametsin Message-ID: <56713AE6.3080105@zest.mail.kapsi.fi> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:20:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 31.47.67.188 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stanislav.muhametsin@zest.mail.kapsi.fi X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false On 16.12.2015 8:07, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Gang, > > There is code that indicates that one can declare a @Concerns directly on > the method, instead of the class. > > I would call this an "unknown feature", not documented and not tested. > > I added the code to support this for @SideEffects as well, but have no time > to document and test it. > > I created a https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST-133 for it. > > Cheers Just a small observation: I remember stumbling upon this back when Qi4CS was very fresh and new and unfinished. Didn't know it was "unknown feature" so I just copied the behaviour to Qi4CS. :)