polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kent SĂžlvsten <kent.soelvs...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Stax XML serialization format...
Date Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:27:34 GMT
Not able to analyse from My holliday on crete.  But: provided we wont run
into trouble with illegal charterselskaber in XML elements i agree . I
Thing the default should be changed for 3.0 though.
 Den 12/07/2015 16.58 skrev "Niclas Hedhman" <niclas@hedhman.org>:

> Gang,
> The StaxValueSerialization format is very verbose, and possibly only
> suitable with an XML browser (i.e. a regular browser with a CSS to make it
> into tables)
>
> From testcase;
> <?xml version="1.1"
>
> encoding="utf-8"?><object><field><name>number</name><value>42</value></field><field><name>nullString</name><value><null></null></value></field><field><name>emptyString</name><value></value></field><field><name>stringList</name><value><array></array></value></field><field><name>anotherNull</name><value><null></null></value></field><field><name>anotherListNull</name><value><null></null></value></field><field><name>anotherListEmpty</name><value><array></array></value></field><field><name>testEnum</name><value>somevalue</value></field><field><name>foo</name><value><object><field><name>_type</name><value>org.qi4j.test.value.AbstractValueCompositeSerializationTest$FooValue</value></field><field><name>bar</name><value></value></field></object></value>
>
> <snip/>
>
> I doubt anybody is using it, and my question is whether it should be kept
> at all, or I should do the same as I did with JSON Maps format, where the
> current format is default, and that a Options flag indicates a leaner
> format, where the tag name is the property name and the element value is
> the value.
>
> WDYAT?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message