polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: Project Name
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:03:36 GMT
But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package
names...

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:

>
> I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who
> isn't heavily involved.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Paul Merlin <paul@nosphere.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>> > Gang,
>> >
>> > Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j),
>> > shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache
>> Zest"
>> > for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache
>> Zest
>> > C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference
>> > between the two.
>> >
>> > If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start
>> modifying
>> > all the documentation to this effect.
>> >
>> > WDYAT?
>> This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any
>> newcomer.
>>
>> So, this is a +1 from me.
>>
>> We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package
>> (see ZEST-24).
>> Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> /Paul
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>



-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message