polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: Binary relese....
Date Wed, 29 Jul 2015 13:10:23 GMT
Thanks for the pointer, Marcel... I think that is a useful compromise.

So, I think we plan that for 3.0 or so, and go with the current "no-deps"
approach.

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:

> For Apache ACE we ended up creating three archives: src, bin and deps. If
> you download src only, you need to make sure you collect/build all deps
> yourself. If you also got the deps archive, you could just “drop that in”
> and our “bin” made sure it contained “something runnable” (but that’s a bit
> different here since ACE is essentially something you can run and Zest is
> really a collection of libraries to use in development.
>
> Greetings, Marcel
>
> On 28 Jul 2015 at 18:31:02, Niclas Hedhman (niclas@hedhman.org) wrote:
>
> Gang,
> sorry that I didnät check this earlier, and I vaguely recall that it has
> been discussed before....
>
> Should the binary release (and the output of the build of the source
> release) contain (or not) the exact dependencies used to build the
> system??
>
> One side of me says; Yes, because that is hard to hunting for if you are
> not a Maven addict.
> And the other says; No, that becomes a too large download, and you still
> don't necesarily get it right since you don't know which jar is needed for
> which library.
>
>
> Comments?
>
> Cheers
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message