polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: Project Name
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:02:21 GMT
I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who
isn't heavily involved.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Paul Merlin <paul@nosphere.org> wrote:

> Hey,
>
> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> > Gang,
> >
> > Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j),
> > shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache
> Zest"
> > for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache
> Zest
> > C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference
> > between the two.
> >
> > If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start modifying
> > all the documentation to this effect.
> >
> > WDYAT?
> This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any
> newcomer.
>
> So, this is a +1 from me.
>
> We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package
> (see ZEST-24).
> Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1?
>
> Cheers
>
> /Paul
>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message