Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zest.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@zest.apache.org
Message-ID: <555DB37D.7020900@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:29:17 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?S2VudCBTw7hsdnN0ZW4=?= <kent.soelvsten@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@zest.apache.org
Subject: Re: ZEST-23
References: 
 <CADmm+KdFrj5mGJW5d5u8PugDP=_sczuBZqgHPLF0J8uoR2w58w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADmm+KeEW52r4j-EsU9Lr1LPjE0HVeS20uwDBac6F8xOt48wUQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <555DA265.1000605@nosphere.org> <555DA85D.8010908@nosphere.org>
 <CADmm+Kd+k9oLNnvHsLf9_Juwx0dcafTd6t0hVAkkorpFKRad+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <555DB298.6080707@nosphere.org>
In-Reply-To: <555DB298.6080707@nosphere.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

  b. Keep the Map serialization for now as it is.
  c. Plan the change for 3.0 later in the year, giving us a bit of time to
figure out the migration.


Agreed

  a. Change NamedAssociation to be serialized in "object" form now.

You mean change the deserializer to expect object form, right?

/Kent


Den 21-05-2015 kl. 12:25 skrev Paul Merlin:
> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Paul Merlin <paul@nosphere.org> wrote:
>>> Looking at it today I don't know why key order should matter.
>>> I'd say that having more idiomatic JSON would make usage less contrived,
>>> which would be a good thing.
>> I agree that is very desirable, and it is now mostly a matter of how to
>> handle data migration, if we go with Kent's advice.
>>
>> Obviously no one uses NamedAssociation, since I can't see that this ever
>> worked, as there is a mismatch (serialize object and deserialize an array)
>> at the moment.
>>
>> Kent, good to know that JS is cool with that.
>>
>> The quickest fix was to change the Serializer to match the Deserializer for
>> NamedAssociations. And I am committing that version shortly in a separate
>> branch...
>>
>> But, while discussing this, I think we should do this;
>>
>>   a. Change NamedAssociation to be serialized in "object" form now.
>>   b. Keep the Map serialization for now as it is.
>>   c. Plan the change for 3.0 later in the year, giving us a bit of time to
>> figure out the migration.
>>
>> WDYT?
> Sounds like a good plan.
>
>