Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zest-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zest-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CACD1746E for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86443 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2015 10:44:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zest-dev-archive@zest.apache.org Received: (qmail 86408 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2015 10:44:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@zest.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@zest.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@zest.apache.org Received: (qmail 86396 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2015 10:44:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hedhman@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.178] (HELO mail-ie0-f178.google.com) (209.85.223.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 10:44:19 +0000 Received: by iedfl3 with SMTP id fl3so12717650ied.1 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:43:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=QhheDCUzFt0dQsNhKy/nM6zIIqlfG/VpXYDgT54Xlrw=; b=Bhyea53Gt6eEXIOy2oNjsXuv8ZknkeZ8AkA/adyTmU6snt29RPD1OLh16BsNYxZEKr IgPBs1vx3yNuh74mEx8GQmUs9EDiTLNsV8ZzD+cN7kaYwsUXcPdVNBhI2w5j5qRDtxBb vlA3NlaA4P9YtQiywtaX3cSxO8ufuoMvvCWotsDj9nHrqX1wj6XeMkR74piogvpdc6Oe IRqJ3QbfDWuJKH7YXWuN/QqJSGOaEo7JgbjBanK+gh/d1HwSP0ApckfmxW2jnktO6A4T OidoppftxMkuuIn7BoMjeCROfZ3w0x51LMOqYgDazIGfj0koZaENU8rl5J0yDkL+uJAY jrRg== X-Received: by 10.50.43.197 with SMTP id y5mr22945381igl.14.1429008222899; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:43:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hedhman@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.44.70 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 03:43:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <552CD497.7050704@nosphere.org> From: Niclas Hedhman Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 18:43:22 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1qHdu5xYbVApjSUtVFZ9iIEI8_Q Message-ID: Subject: Re: QuickCheck instead of JUnit To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118260881d4bc0513ace72d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0118260881d4bc0513ace72d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Sandro Martini wrote: > Zest-sandbox as a playing area in git could be the place, right ? > Of course I ahve to better understand Zest codebase in next period. > The repositories are now empty, until IP clearance is completed. Then the Github repos will be copied across and we are on the way. > On developing code in Zest codebase, the standard approach is to > develop a feature in a dedicated git branch, and then merge (if/when > needed) ? Maybe some generic info on coding style for Zest developers > could be useful, to simplify things to new comers ... > See http://qi4j.org/community/codebase.html and other documentation in Community section. > A dedicated JIRA issue could be good to start tracking this feature. > Good idea; https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEST Last, next time I'll post directly (thanks to Niclas in the meantime) :-) . > New blood is always welcome. -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org/qi4j - New Energy for Java --089e0118260881d4bc0513ace72d--