polygene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: Discuss; SLF4J in Core
Date Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:35:46 GMT
Please take note on where you think we need to focus on documentation. It
is big topic and hard to get right.

Niclas

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:23 PM, James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com>
wrote:

> I really need to dig into this code and start playing with it.  This
> stuff sounds really cool!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Stanislav Muhametsin
> <stanislav.muhametsin@kapsi.fi> wrote:
> > On 31.3.2015 12:33, Kent SĂžlvsten wrote:
> >>
> >> Of course there would be challenges to avoid excessive work "when noone
> >> listens" - but application events have been discussed years ago (i think
> >> without being solved) - maybe it is about time to look at that again?
> >>
> > Without knowing the details of this, I would say that if situation when
> "no
> > one is listening" is known at assembly/model creation time, this part
> would
> > be easy for Qi4CS at least.
> > This is because Qi4CS does not generate any code during runtime - it
> > generates the code when one compiles the project that uses Qi4CS.
> > So anything no-op can be very much optimized.
>



-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message