poi-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From EP...@upstate.com
Subject RE: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions fo
Date Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:13:10 GMT
Well, I may be a bit biased since I am a maven committer :-)  My main focus
has been in the testing realm, working primarily on the cactus maven plugin.

What I think would be the most difficult aspect for maven and poi is the
various jars that poi produces.  The main jar, and then the various contrib
and scratchpad jars.  However, if you used maven's reactor capabilities, and
made poi a single project, and the contrib and scrathpad inheriting
projects, then you could have the multple source trees that poi seems to
like.  

I just like all the pregenerated source documentation and the source x-ref
html pages, I find I hit them as often as my javadocs!  Having both
Centipede and Maven competing will only lead to better tools!

Eric Pugh

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:gstamp@iinet.net.au]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:02 PM
To: POI Users List
Subject: RE: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions
fo


At 01:29 AM 18/03/2003, you wrote:
>I nominate maven, just because of all the plugin integration..   But
>definitly lets see what centipede can do first!

Centipede's got a pretty good selection of plugins too...  Were there any 
of mavens plugins which you were particularly interested in?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: poi-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message