poi-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoli...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions fo
Date Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:01:09 GMT
I have a sneaking suspicion that if you volunteer to set this up, it 
will further the effort significantly.
Everything working and working under GUMP is what is important.  
Everything else is superfluous.


EPugh@upstate.com wrote:

>Well, I may be a bit biased since I am a maven committer :-)  My main focus
>has been in the testing realm, working primarily on the cactus maven plugin.
>What I think would be the most difficult aspect for maven and poi is the
>various jars that poi produces.  The main jar, and then the various contrib
>and scratchpad jars.  However, if you used maven's reactor capabilities, and
>made poi a single project, and the contrib and scrathpad inheriting
>projects, then you could have the multple source trees that poi seems to
>I just like all the pregenerated source documentation and the source x-ref
>html pages, I find I hit them as often as my javadocs!  Having both
>Centipede and Maven competing will only lead to better tools!
>Eric Pugh
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:gstamp@iinet.net.au]
>Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 9:02 PM
>To: POI Users List
>Subject: RE: Build in disrepair Re: Where are the convenience functions
>At 01:29 AM 18/03/2003, you wrote:
>>I nominate maven, just because of all the plugin integration..   But
>>definitly lets see what centipede can do first!
>Centipede's got a pretty good selection of plugins too...  Were there any 
>of mavens plugins which you were particularly interested in?
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: poi-user-help@jakarta.apache.org

View raw message