Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-poi-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-poi-general-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0952B7442 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32614 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2011 09:18:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-poi-general-archive@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 32282 invoked by uid 500); 25 Aug 2011 09:18:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@poi.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 32254 invoked by uid 99); 25 Aug 2011 09:18:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:18:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nick.burch@alfresco.com designates 207.126.144.127 as permitted sender) Received: from [207.126.144.127] (HELO eu1sys200aog109.obsmtp.com) (207.126.144.127) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:17:49 +0000 Received: from zimbra.alfresco.com ([88.151.129.3]) by eu1sys200aob109.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKTlYTKavbP6RWcP8OUw9mJCTbmSepn2xU@postini.com; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:17:29 UTC Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.alfresco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66F64143D9 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:17:29 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unx-d-manc4.tc.ifeltd.com Received: from zimbra.alfresco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.alfresco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BlKdkj-tig21 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:17:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from urchin.earth.li (urchin.earth.li [212.13.204.73]) (Authenticated sender: nick.burch@alfresco.com) by zimbra.alfresco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A119414C1A for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:16:08 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:16:07 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Burch X-X-Sender: nick@urchin.earth.li To: general@poi.apache.org Subject: Re: HWPF implications of being in the scratchpad In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Valentin Jacquemin wrote: > What are the implications of saying HWPF is in the scratchpad, does it > mean that the project is not stable enough to be used? The main thing is that the API isn't fixed. We try to keep compatibility on the things in the main jar between releases, often binary compatibility but we should always have source compatibility. For scratchpad, the API isn't as mature so we don't make the same promises. Generally hand-in-hand with that is that the code in scratchpad isn't as full-featured, and possibly doesn't handle as many cases. > After browsing the dev-list it seems it's still in active development > and maybe [1] is not up to date, thus my question. I think we need to tempt Sergey to update the hwpf page with some of his recent changes :) Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@poi.apache.org