From dev-return-39646-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@poi.apache.org Thu Mar 1 00:16:41 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 075DB180657 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 00:16:40 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1921 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2018 23:16:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "POI Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 1908 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2018 23:16:39 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:16:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AE89BC0F1C for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:16:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.112 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.112 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mK7njV49qKo9 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net [96.114.154.165]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7783B5F2EE for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from resomta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.234]) by resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id rAwseZSDjqcImrAxYe2Cxh; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:16:28 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20161114; t=1519859788; bh=XMrSgwDPhmnFBO/acyZ9GmurDxtFzvm/SNC9Ynk4po8=; h=Received:Received:From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Date:Subject: Message-Id:To; b=h/G7KK8WOupf02wg+nAuYUe/olg3I4wn+ac+/ZLq1FBj8SD6ONCXfMLw5KOqrpz1p bnCbDVHVU7F5pl6SAEdEu7SohHn2rqUOF6jcc+CWbTghaz4Uez0XEfZoFr+oNplcgu wohgmy6SFDoHWAO94ls5+jfAtmTTBqCWrdBpOSDAesbFN8aBQxXhnCUm0KqxzJhAgo zX95VULi7oRNZHCC0t/v7wSaugQh7NU5OXKJjSI4si4BtAcalUgygCTzuJAi45joPe xJedzY5tN7uprvCTy4P48uSO3W/DxJUkYCw6uhnYv8qc9ovBSP1l7ey36WZsK/O9/j Hb/b6MyBiT3iw== Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([24.4.64.76]) by resomta-po-10v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id rAxXeCKpw5vXJrAxYeALtH; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:16:28 +0000 From: Dave Fisher Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 15:16:26 -0800 Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars Message-Id: <5ABBD1DE-A39A-4F32-8E08-6E01494A7EAC@comcast.net> References: <1519059718076-0.post@n5.nabble.com> <4CBBBDD7FB566C4DB70EB7A04E0B466F01854E36@exchange3> <1519133149816-0.post@n5.nabble.com> <4CBBBDD7FB566C4DB70EB7A04E0B466F01854EA4@exchange3> <4CBBBDD7FB566C4DB70EB7A04E0B466F01854EE0@exchange3> <4CBBBDD7FB566C4DB70EB7A04E0B466F01854EF7@exchange3> <1519850060085-0.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: To: POI Developers List X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDnoP7fdQftltjJltD+umVpYZLKeVmQBnO+0zI/4dYaiNCSACxWSz3axmD8Szh24jlv0Lbk6DGnfT/N3zRRflpD4emfaw/jWlgBFmVJ/pleeWuhLo2Al XCNV9/Xy7phZRxWr4/rH9xakFyt0a3rdTl7eDgHqPG+3RpuWD+qs+2BQ You might point out how widely used POI is include Tika and Solr as consumer= s of POI/XMLBeans. Also taking it out of the Attic was previously suggested by others... Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 28, 2018, at 12:41 PM, Nick Burch wrote: >=20 >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018, pj.fanning wrote: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/attic-general/201802.mbox/%3C151= 9744891.257410.1285160920.6801732D%40webmail.messagingengine.com%3E >>=20 >> Looks like we're not going to make much progress on resurrecting Apache >> XMLBeans. >=20 > The big problem is with Maven users: > * Anyone using Maven to depend on xmlbeans explicitly won't know to > switch to org.apache.poi:xmlbeans to get the fixes > * Maven won't know that the the old 2.6.0 release and our new fix are > the same thing, so will happy pull both in >=20 > The smaller problem is by-hand-dependency users - the number of people on s= tackoverflow or the mailing list who try combining old and new POI jars + ge= t stuck is rather high - so the chances of those people getting it right is n= ear zero >=20 > As long as all existing XMLBeans unit tests pass, it should be safe (+sens= ible) for existing xmlbeans users to upgrade to our fixed version. >=20 >=20 > Could someone help work up a good explanation of the jar-hell + maven issu= es, so we can go back to the attic with a reason why we should be allowed to= do it? (My reading of the attic wasn't a flat-out no, just a "no unless you= have a good reason otherwise") >=20 > Nick >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org >=20 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org