Return-Path: <dev-return-38761-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@poi.apache.org>
X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io
Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183])
	by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0AA200D3C
	for <archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 06:54:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix)
	id 7DA3E160BF8; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:38 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id C32DD160BE4
	for <archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 06:54:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 11042 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2017 05:54:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@poi.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@poi.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.poi.apache.org>
Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <dev@poi.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@poi.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11031 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2017 05:54:36 -0000
Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:36 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1041A183F1B
	for <dev@poi.apache.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
	by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id M2-L6wit-usY for <dev@poi.apache.org>;
	Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139])
	by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 30B1B5FAF3
	for <dev@poi.apache.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from asf-bz1-us-mid.priv.apache.org (nat1-us-mid.apache.org [23.253.172.122])
	by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AE8FCE00A3
	for <dev@poi.apache.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by asf-bz1-us-mid.priv.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at asf-bz1-us-mid.priv.apache.org, from userid 33)
	id 81C2B60F69; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@poi.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 61677] ChainLoopDetector failing with
 java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: <negative number>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: POI
X-Bugzilla-Component: POIFS
X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.17-FINAL
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: yrashk@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dev@poi.apache.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-61677-47293-TO7cmJmXum@https.bz.apache.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61677-47293@https.bz.apache.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61677-47293@https.bz.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
archived-at: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 05:54:38 -0000

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61677

--- Comment #8 from Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk@gmail.com> ---
I investigated this issue further. It looks like Outlook is able to render =
the
email, one of the attachment is actually broken (too short). To me it feels
like Outlook (or whatever library they use for working with CFBF) is rather
lazy (won't read everything in upon initialization) and POIFS is effectively
more eager.

Do you think there is any truth to this and possible workarounds? I'd rather
have a portion of that email recovered than have nothing at all (effectivel=
y,
minic Outlook's behaviour)

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org