Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41501200C24 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:22:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3E6C0160B6A; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AB7E0160B49 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 07:22:08 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 5696 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2017 06:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "POI Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 5681 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2017 06:22:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 06:22:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 17D8AC0D93 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:22:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.174 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.174 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FROM_MISSPACED=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-L0dvPN49mP for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7ADA55FCD0 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:22:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2D38DE00C7 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 06:21:56 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: 3.16 Beta1 vs 3.15 FINAL References: From: "Jeevan Chamarthi" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" x-ponymail-sender: 445cca8988c5e60dfd23ee5219555913075b1b27 Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 06:21:54 -0000 x-ponymail-agent: PonyMail Composer/0.2 To: X-Mailer: LuaSocket 3.0-rc1 archived-at: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 06:22:09 -0000 Hi Guys, I am working on a production application which uses Apache POI PPT, during which I encountered a bug with poi ppt table row height which is resolved in 3.16 beta1. Wanted to know if it is fine to switch to beta releases without risk. Please suggest. Thanks, Jeevan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org