Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-31701-apmail-poi-dev-archive=poi.apache.org@poi.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4103918D8E
	for <apmail-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:47:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 82019 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2015 14:47:39 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@poi.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81976 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2015 14:47:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@poi.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@poi.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.poi.apache.org>
Reply-To: "POI Developers List" <dev@poi.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@poi.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81965 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2015 14:47:39 -0000
Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org)
 (140.211.11.15)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:47:39 +0000
Received: from [192.168.178.54] (p4FEB69A6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
 [79.235.105.166])
	by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with
 ESMTPSA id 6E8C21A0149
	for <dev@poi.apache.org>; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:47:37 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Ready for 3.14-Beta1?
To: POI Developers List <dev@poi.apache.org>
References: <564E5607.3030507@apache.org>
 <CAM+Tpp+=f1VmJO5F+NLKegAUwBL2N94Rrk-nMLMJbOjd=Aedtg@mail.gmail.com>
 <564F05B2.20102@corefiling.co.uk>
From: Andreas Beeker <kiwiwings@apache.org>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <565B1009.4030607@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 15:47:37 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/42.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <564F05B2.20102@corefiling.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi David,

in case you'll start with the beta preparation soon, please leave an one-liner here,
with the time you begin, so we stop committing stuff by then.

Apart of that, feel free to begin with the releasing.

> I'm still happy to do so if that's acceptable to everyone?
One thing, which took me a while to realize is ... silence is acceptance! [1] ;)

Andi

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Silence_and_consensus

On 20.11.2015 12:36, David North wrote:
> Yes, it's definitely time. As previously discussed there was a
> suggestion that I'd manage this one (as a one-off) to confirm that the
> process is well-documented enough for someone new to follow. I'm still
> happy to do so if that's acceptable to everyone?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On 20/11/15 00:47, Javen O'Neal wrote:
>> Keeping with the 2 month release cycle, I'd say it's a good time for
>> another release. My vote would be to include the ooxml-schema fix in the
>> beta to maximize time for people to report issues before 3.14 final.
>>
>> π!!!
>> Hi,
>>
>> the changes since 3.13 don't fit anymore on my browser window *), I guess
>> it's time for 3.14-Beta1,
>> what do you think?
>>
>> Should we do the beta before or after the ooxml-schema patch? (#58617)
>>
>> Andi
>>
>> *) yes, I know, press <ctrl>+<-> ...
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org