Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A59E5186D3 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70301 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2015 05:47:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 70255 invoked by uid 500); 28 May 2015 05:47:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "POI Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 70243 invoked by uid 99); 28 May 2015 05:47:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:47:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BAA02C093B for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:47:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iOU8N3pj2hYA for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 68E45207A7 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 05:47:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com ([209.85.212.173]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbPza-1ZPiHj3aLS-00ktWQ for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 07:47:22 +0200 Received: by wifw1 with SMTP id w1so47642741wif.0 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:47:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.238.193 with SMTP id vm1mr1919460wjc.57.1432792041245; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.145.21 with HTTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 22:47:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55664748.7080505@apache.org> References: <20150527203801.E7F7EAC06F7@hades.apache.org> <55664748.7080505@apache.org> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 07:47:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r1682117 - /poi/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/document/index.xml From: Dominik Stadler To: POI Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:u8FpiqJ0SBCjZO5sSWbZC9IbQBbw94QbnY+MF0ps8pFdqAZB4gB hxtwjQQJGS2ij1KXGq3hSB4DYPZAfWpHLJZcU+M9thYdmaeg5ZF6GHAPA5J3RfG50oLpImO fLMStjMCW7lLDl9SC9mZQERanWgyCB1P50DZskKEMrxgsVVrRpVnvNsaucSACUHfyYu/CQG 23tpPM58itmoKoBXsaVEg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6l1HkLAm270=:n/iFxvpRVdRui52Hb+I8sG mV4lG3/C67ijVDCfKlMPylDxTaQcW+p3CkC0mhMumDwqrItqH6sMIjLtKL2hyOkN42SRJ1ee9 cA+609VkgyKei5nNSJd6ivx63pIzB2xAv0lG5w4CKlU57kUdbKp4RUazGPolvGaiqXt22xZER jtfHgRCApXct8t76R9aUaur9YKrwoGP7RVnyG4v9Wrg53xCxz51A+Xg/3eCYzlEZ/hTNR6dWq 5kFtDBistSr411by/JPXfm2ehwntKXwt2/Q23LCiWCXXsJ3+dGHKJMSi5hvX0W6Y4pa9aNJ3+ OqGkeLmNjwW2cgdmygvZXQnAVUvCB+vg3012+MZHalCHg/6lEm7HRJag6yuxywH9x2vRic3cf GGt5YSr+/d1NV7bqzwT5oKxyJ2KwIPpRtL3EHA+1b8VZlmshVUWcfWOmTzu+6WEUWiAitvKGQ yEyGOFj63xiRjHrU8WLmm7DZM7XUPaDUMVv2ERQoWQOcyFQcLN3HDkIcSDdZCVPi2pDNSiuS1 1XinqfEhLukA5mxmAomHoN+37mxygkk93Dst/4hCsUeNJ4hUkOHimgqVILKpoEBQbemkS7b9k mKt5wYuEYetq98/6zjcLc5uhgh7aXiGghrc9lOckEb9Vqqwv64X2FI6TUgmUPVlCxrzPG4Y2M JutJcTkbnDA4/R3n9dRISuHrS0Rubcf8BrdwGcknP7vPkPCcuiJhbgWTFZwkVz1YjED4= Yes, it's not good, but at least for 3.12 it seems to be the case, I just found out the day before when I tried to use XWPFDocument myself. BTW, it was introduced via commit "Stub a common WP paragraph class, needs uncommenting as XWPF implements/emulates", r1657712 in February, we likely can just move the one class into main to be fine again. I have entered https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D57963 to not forget about the documentation side when this is done. Dominik. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Andreas Beeker wro= te: >> Ideally we should have the core classes/interfaces in the main jar, so t= hat the ooxml classes can work without scratchpad. I'd say it's fine for sc= ratchpad to depend on core, ooxml to depend on core, not sure about ooxml (= nominally stable) depending on scratchpad (nominally not) >> >> What does everyone else think? > > I haven't checked the background of what xwpf depends on in scratchpad, b= ut if it's not a big chunk of classes, I'd prefer to move those to main. > In the context of the jackcess-discussion, I'd even more prefer, if we sp= lit those components to separate jars having the X/H??F classes together. > > Andi > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org