poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dominik Stadler <dominik.stad...@gmx.at>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1682117 - /poi/site/src/documentation/content/xdocs/document/index.xml
Date Thu, 28 May 2015 05:47:21 GMT
Yes, it's not good, but at least for 3.12 it seems to be the case, I
just found out the day before when I tried to use XWPFDocument myself.

BTW, it was introduced via commit "Stub a common WP paragraph class,
needs uncommenting as XWPF implements/emulates", r1657712 in February,
we likely can just move the one class into main to be fine again.

I have entered https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57963 to
not forget about the documentation side when this is done.

Dominik.

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Andreas Beeker <kiwiwings@apache.org> wrote:
>> Ideally we should have the core classes/interfaces in the main jar, so that the ooxml
classes can work without scratchpad. I'd say it's fine for scratchpad to depend on core, ooxml
to depend on core, not sure about ooxml (nominally stable) depending on scratchpad (nominally
not)
>>
>> What does everyone else think?
>
> I haven't checked the background of what xwpf depends on in scratchpad, but if it's not
a big chunk of classes, I'd prefer to move those to main.
> In the context of the jackcess-discussion, I'd even more prefer, if we split those components
to separate jars having the X/H??F classes together.
>
> Andi
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org


Mime
View raw message