Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 26381 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2008 14:13:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2008 14:13:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 23349 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2008 14:13:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-poi-dev-archive@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 23118 invoked by uid 500); 16 Apr 2008 14:13:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@poi.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "POI Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@poi.apache.org Received: (qmail 23109 invoked by uid 99); 16 Apr 2008 14:13:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 07:13:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [81.187.40.70] (HELO fluffy.torchbox.com) (81.187.40.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:13:00 +0000 Received: from [2001:8b0:c5:1:213:2ff:fedc:110d] (helo=grenache.internal.torchbox.com) by fluffy.torchbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Jm8Nq-0002v4-35 for dev@poi.apache.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:13:10 +0100 Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:11:05 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Burch X-X-Sender: nick@localhost.localdomain To: POI Developers List Subject: Re: List of Patents required to implement OOXML (was: Rejection of In-Reply-To: <4805FB5A.4000403@buni.org> Message-ID: References: <48059763.3040203@buni.org> <3d4032300804160456k7945f9c8n106c070c905f9b93@mail.gmail.com> <4805F3C4.40403@buni.org> <4805FB5A.4000403@buni.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (LFD 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Organization: Torchbox Ltd, Registered Company #3983354, Unit 9, Southill Business Park, OX7 3EW, UK X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > So That is awesome! We won't accept your evidence until AFTER the ill > motivation is demonstrated in like court, but we simultaneously won't > let you revert it. All I can say is that I didn't write the policy... You're an ASF member, aren't you? That means you're in a position to get involved in changing the policy, if you feel there's a flaw in it (as I guess you do). dev@poi probably isn't the place to do so though > Really you had a chat about me vetoing things before I even threatened > to? Awesome! I spent a very large amount of time at ApacheCon talking to people about poi, ooxml and microsoft. Several board members are aware of your position, and some people were kind enough to clarify what is and isn't allowed with a veto in the ASF. > At the end of the week I start reverting things, you will HAVE to revoke > my access to prevent that. May I ask why a deadline that's so soon? I started work on the ooxml support back in December. SourceSense joined the effort in January. It's now April. Do we really need to act by the end of the week? Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org