poi-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoli...@buni.org>
Subject Re: Rejection of any ENCUMBERED Microsoft Donation to POI
Date Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:52:07 GMT
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2008, at 4:23 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>>> I'm happy to (re)state this. Sourcesense owns the copyright to their 
>>> contribution to the OOXML branch of POI.
>> On that point but not the patent.
> Good, at least that's a step forward.
>>> Would that be enough?
>> Resolve the patent issue and it will be.
> I don't think there is a lot to be done on this side. I personally 
> believe the OSP is enough to let us work on OOXML. You think that's not 
> the case. Stalemate? Not quite. The POI PMC has asked for an explicit 
> clearance to the ASF legal team, and got a green light. To me that's 
> pretty much all we need, and any further discussion on whether the OSP 
> (or whatever the new ISO/ECMA patent rules for OOXML are) is acceptable 
> or not shouldn't even fall within the remit of the PMC itself, as that's 
> a clear competence of the legal counsel. I can only reiterate my invite 
> to discuss the matter where it belongs (starting from legal-discuss and 
> maybe expanding on http://tinyurl.com/58uk2v): the POI PMC will then 
> just have to abide by whatever the decision of Apache's powers that be is.
> Ciao,

That thread is insufficient.  I'm still -1 on the commit.  Get explicit 
clarification on the OSP from an actual lawyer or Microsoft.  I support 
you having believes and practicing them, so long as they don't endanger 
POI and its users which I believe you to be doing.  I believe that you 
are behaving a bit irresponsibly at the moment.



Buni Meldware Communication Suite
Multi-platform and extensible Email,
Calendaring (including freebusy),
Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease
of installation/administration.

View raw message