Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-poi-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 20926 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 23:51:29 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 23:51:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 81138 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2003 23:51:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-poi-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 81122 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2003 23:51:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "POI Developers List" Reply-To: "POI Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list poi-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 81107 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 23:51:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO set.superlinksoftware.com) (66.35.175.110) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 23:51:13 -0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]) by set.superlinksoftware.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.1) with SMTP ID 472 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:38:30 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:51:27 -0500 Subject: Re: Status: Towards 2.0 From: "Andrew C. Oliver" To: POI Developers List Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20031007164122.20722.qmail@station171.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N You rock dude. =20 Minor correction: must fix should be "must resolve" and the resolution coul= d be "reporter full of it" or "not really a bug"... :-) -Andy On 10/7/03 11:41 AM, "Avik Sengupta" wrote: > The following is the status of all bugs mentioned in Andy's original post > about "must fix" bugs for 2.0 final release. For more context, > please see the original mail below. As you can see, we are making good > progress (even if i say so myself :) with over half the list already done= . >=20 > The biggest issue remaining is the international strings problem (12843).= Some > are simple that i'll do over the next week or so. After that, i'll addres= s > individual issues on the list, and we can decide if we want each of them = to > block the 2.0 release. >=20 > Enjoy.=20 >=20 > 13424 NOT DONE > 13921 NOT DONE > 14734 Fixed in HEAD. Will it go to branch? Rainer? > 14824 Glen says fixed (will u close the bug?) > 15375 Probably done, waiting for confirmation > 16488 NOT DONE > 16559 NOT DONE > 16560 NOT DONE > 16756 Shawn says its Fixed (will u close the bug?) > 16985 NOT DONE (Avik) > 17196 NOT DONE =96 we need better testcases, i dont think this is a =93gen= eral=94 > issue > 17329 Danny says its Fixed (will u close the bug?) > 17374 NOT DONE =96 trivial > 17494 NOT DONE > 18800 NOT DONE =96 needs confirmation > 19321 NOT DONE > 19599 NOT DONE > 19961 Fixed > 20048 WontFix > 20550 Reportedly fixed. To check with testcase > 21066 Fixed (Glen is this in branch as well?) > 21646 DUP 15375 > 14493 Unlikely =96 needs more confirmation/testcase b4 it can be fixed > 9576 Fixed in HEAD by Jason. Open issue on BRANCH > 12843 NOT DONE (may solve 12561,15556,22742 .. we desperately need mor= e > =93double byte=94 testers who can test the patch and report back!) > 13229 NOT DONE (forrest issue =96 Glen?) > 13478 Done > 15008 NOT DONE (Andy/Tetsuya?) > 16985 NOT DONE (not a patch) Avik > 18837 NOT DONE > 18846 Marked fixed, but dont know if applied (Tetsuya?) > 21444 Done > 21673 Closed via 21444 > 21674 Done > 21722 Done > 41330 Fixed > 13796 Fixed > 14460 Fixed > 15228 Done >=20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > ------------ > On 7/24/03 1:22 PM, "Andrew C. Oliver" <acoliver@apache.org&= gt; > wrote: >=20 > > Before we release 2.0, the following are "must fix" bugs I= MHO. > Some need to > > be researched and invalidated (if they aren't valid) or noted as > "can't fix > > till 3.0" (if they aren't tooooo serious and aren't blockers): > >=20 > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D6802 > > 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11744 > > 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D12561 (Tetsuya?= ) > > 4. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D12730 > > 5. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13224 (Avik &am= p; > me) > > 6. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13249 (Avik?) > > 7. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13424 (ALL) > > 8. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13921 > > 9. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14734 (Rainer) > > 10. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14824 > > 11. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D15375 (Glen?) > > 12. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16488 (investi= gate) > > 13. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16559 (Danny) > > 14. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16560 (Danny) > > 15. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16756 > > 16. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16985 > > 17. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17196 (Avik &a= mp; > Andy) > > 18. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17329 (fixed?) > > 19. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17374 (Andy) > > 20. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D17494 > > 21. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D18800 > > 22. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D19321 > > 23. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D19599 (Tetsuya= ?) > > 24. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D19961 > > 25. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20048 > > 26. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D20550 > > 27. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21066 > > 28. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21646 > >=20 > > Unlikely (Stranger than fiction) : > >=20 > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14493 > >=20 > >=20 > > PATCHES > >=20 > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D9576 > > 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D12843 > > 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13229 (Glen, is= this > > relevant any more?) > > 4. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13478 (Chris > convinced > > me) > > 5. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D15008 (Tetsuya) > > 6. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D16985 (Tetsuya) > > 7. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D18837 > > 8. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D18846 (Tetsuya) > > 9. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21444 (AndY) > > 10. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21673 > > 11. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21674 > > 12. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D21722 (Andy) > >=20 > >=20 > > Formula related, should look into (may not fix for 2.0-final) > > * we probably shouldn't completely CHOKE on these when they can't be= read > > for final * > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14330 > > 2. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D13796 > > 3. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14460 > >=20 > >=20 > > Stuff Avik and I haven't committed yet: > >=20 > > 1. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D15228 > >=20 > >=20 > > Lets try and work through these so we can get 2.0 out of the door! > --=20 Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with everything espoused in the above email. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org