See I'm not so sure about FOP and Batik... I think we may find that pieces
of them are best moved out...but really sections of them are very XML-ish
On 7/4/03 3:28 PM, "Tetsuya Kitahata" <tetsuya@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 06:11:34 -0400
> "Ryan Ackley" <sackley@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> To me FOP doesn't really belong. Its main purpose is not to create PDFs but
>> to render XSL-FO to various formats. PDF just happens to be the main target
>> format. I would say use their code to go in a new direction but I don't
>> think FOP as it exists now would fit in to the spirit of a file format
>> project.
>
> Okay. XSL-FO is smart.
>
> Wondering the "file format project" (a.k.a. FFP?)...
> 1. FOP
> 2. Batik
> 3. Jakarta-Commons (sandbox-BZIP2?)
> 4. Cocoon
> 5. Jakarta-Commons (sandbox-csv/ in proposal recently, I think)
> 6. POI
> 7. (TNEF)
>
> /*** Oh! ... Stefano Land... :-) */
>
> How wonderful it would be to collaborate with various projects!
>
> Sincerely,
>
> -- Tetsuya (tetsuya@apache.org)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: poi-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: poi-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
--
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?
|