plc4x-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Julian Feinauer <>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Release 0.4
Date Mon, 06 May 2019 13:30:50 GMT

I have some issues with the build.
I did:

* Check out the latest develop (3e712a66470bef07f8650106553333ea68d8904c) and clean all non-versioned
files from the project
* one build using `mvn clean install -DskipTests`
* one build using `mvn clean install -Pwith-cpp,with-python,with-dotnet,with-proxies,with-sandbox`

The first one works fine on my Mac with OS X Mojave (10.14.4), Java 8 (Hotspot 1.8.0_66-ea).
The second one fails with

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-assembly-plugin:3.1.1:single
(package-thrift-python) on project plc4x-tools-thrift: Failed to create assembly: Error creating
assembly archive python: archive cannot be empty -> [Help 1]
[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e switch.
[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions, please read the following
[ERROR] [Help 1]
[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the command
[ERROR]   mvn <goals> -rf :plc4x-tools-thrift


Am 06.05.19, 08:51 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <>:

    Hi all,
    Good idea Chris, I'll do it later in the office and post my result here.
    And thanks Tim for stepping back, I agree that Chris should have the honor and also had
the experience to fix all the incubaror stuff which still is in some templates and so.
    So I suggest that we all state the work in progress which should go to the release, if
there is any.
    I only am aware of the scraper and S7 types would be great.
    Any other opinions?
    Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
    -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
    Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release 0.4
    Von: Christofer Dutz
    One good preparation would be for all to do full builds: with-cpp,with-python,with-dotnet,with-proxies,with-sandbox
... One person did report having problems. Would like to find out why.
    Outlook für Android<> herunterladen
    From: Tim Mitsch <>
    Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 12:31:43 AM
    Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Release 0.4
    Hey everybody,
    full ack ... a soon release shall be done, as we have enough stuff that could be released.
    I can do the release as i got a great introduction of how to do it with 0.3.1 by Julian,
thanks for that btw.
    But i think Chris has the honor to decide if he wants to do the first Release of PLC4X
matured to TLP - would love to support
    I think end of this or beginning of next week could be a good date for a 0.4.0-RC1
    Am 05.05.19, 21:04 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <>:
        Hi all,
        I also think we should do a release soon. Especially for making a first tlp release.
        Regarding the RM, I would like to actually perform the technical release this time.
I'm quite sure I changed the graduation related stuff correctly, but with all this super special
additional stuff (CPP, C#, Python, Thrift) I am sorry of expecting bumps on the road.
        I'm fine with Tim doing the paperwork, if he wants to ;-)
        Outlook für Android<> herunterladen
        From: Julian Feinauer <>
        Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 7:52:31 PM
        Subject: [DISCUSSION] Release 0.4
        Hi all,
        we also had a short discussion about the next release of PLC4X but I guess the best
place is the list.
        So I think we should start very soon with the preparation of a new release.
        I also think we should include some of the very recent things (Python, CPP) but explicitly
flag them as experimental feature.
        So we can give them out to others but with a clear disclaimer that this is more a
“play around” thing.
        And we are free to target the next release “soon” to add some more things.
        I see that there are a lot of “small” improvements which we really should get
out, and I would also love to start collecting feedback for the “experimental” stuff.
        Another question that came up was who will be RM.
        Tim already volunteered for that, and I absolutely support that to further diversify
the RMs.
        But as the build recently changed it could be a bit complicated so Chris offered to
do it this time.
        I cannot say what is the best solution but leave it up to everybody.
        Perhaps a solution would be to have Tim “manage” it and prepare everything and
then do the maven related stuff with supervision from chris or by chris. By doing this he
gets at least a good knowledge of the process around (branching strat, vote preparation and
        What are your opinions?
        I think we could target something like the end of next week for an RC.

View raw message