plc4x-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Mitsch <t.mit...@pragmaticindustries.de>
Subject Re: Preparation of Release 0.3.1
Date Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:24:52 GMT
Hey guys

Sorry that has been my fault ... i fixed that issue but did not resolved the jira ticket.
I have done that just few minutes ago with relation the regarding commit.

So from my side we could start for preparing 0.3.1 RC

Best 
Tim 


´╗┐Am 28.02.19, 12:33 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>:

    Cause that would have been the last open S7 bug that's been reported and is still open...
    
    Chris
    
    Am 28.02.19, 12:33 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>:
    
        Not quite sure, if we should also have a look at:
        PLC4X-78 Write operations seem to fail
        
        Am 28.02.19, 12:03 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j.feinauer@pragmaticminds.de>:
        
            Thanks Chris,
            
            @tim: Can you clarify or give your feedback about PLC4X-83?
            
            
            Julian
            
            ________________________________
            Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
            Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 11:27:17
            An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
            Betreff: Re: Preparation of Release 0.3.1
            
            Hi Julian,
            
            I thought Tim had fixed that ... as he did that I didn't want to close it as this
way I would have been the person who resolved it ;-)
            
            Chris
            
            
            
            Am 28.02.19, 10:19 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j.feinauer@pragmaticminds.de>:
            
                Hey,
            
            
                did anyone do any further checks for our planned release 0.3.1.
            
                The two TIckets PLC4X-82 and PLC4X-84 are marked as done but PLC4X-83 (When
requesting an odd number of bytes in payload the fill-byte is not handled correctly) is still
open.
            
            
                @cdutz, @tim
            
                Both of you did most of the work... can you give an update?
            
                I would like to end this soon and prepare an RC.
            
            
                Best
            
                Julian
            
            
            
        
        
    
    

Mime
View raw message