plc4x-dev mailing list archives: January 2019

Site index · List index
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Stefan Bodewig Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Wed, 02 Jan, 11:34
Christofer Dutz Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Wed, 02 Jan, 12:55
Stefan Bodewig Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Wed, 02 Jan, 15:56
Julian Feinauer Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Thu, 03 Jan, 09:28
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [133]' Thu, 03 Jan, 14:07
Christofer Dutz Re: Update to the C++ Module Thu, 03 Jan, 14:10
Christofer Dutz Re: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [133]' Thu, 03 Jan, 14:25
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [134]' Thu, 03 Jan, 14:58
Christofer Dutz Re: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Fri, 04 Jan, 10:03
Christofer Dutz Profinet Spec Fri, 04 Jan, 12:43
Markus Sommer AW: Update to the C++ Module Mon, 07 Jan, 09:34
Christofer Dutz Re: Update to the C++ Module Mon, 07 Jan, 10:19
Markus Sommer AW: [DRAFT] January Podling Report Apache PLC4X (incubating) Mon, 07 Jan, 11:32
Christofer Dutz New Article on PLC4X available ... Tue, 08 Jan, 10:33
Christofer Dutz Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 09:45
Julian Feinauer Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 10:13
Christofer Dutz Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 10:18
Christofer Dutz Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:06
Christofer Dutz Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:17
Sebastian Wiendl Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:18
Markus Sommer AW: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:20
Christofer Dutz Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:34
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:37
Markus Sommer AW: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:40
Sebastian Wiendl Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:41
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 14:57
Sebastian Wiendl Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 15:46
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 16:00
Sebastian Wiendl Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 16:21
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 16:49
Julian Feinauer Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:16
Julian Feinauer Nightly Builds Wed, 09 Jan, 17:25
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:26
Christofer Dutz Re: Nightly Builds Wed, 09 Jan, 17:28
Julian Feinauer Re: Nightly Builds Wed, 09 Jan, 17:33
Julian Feinauer Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:46
Julian Feinauer Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:55
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 17:58
Julian Feinauer Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Wed, 09 Jan, 18:01
Christofer Dutz Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 09 Jan, 18:01
Markus Sommer AW: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Thu, 10 Jan, 09:33
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Thu, 10 Jan, 09:41
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 09:15
Julian Feinauer Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 09:33
Tim Mitsch [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device Tue, 15 Jan, 09:50
Julian Feinauer Re: [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device Tue, 15 Jan, 10:31
Christofer Dutz Re: [S7] (manual) testing vs physical device Tue, 15 Jan, 10:47
Otto Fowler Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 12:12
GitBox [GitHub] timbo2k opened a new pull request #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 13:41
Christofer Dutz Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 15:43
Otto Fowler Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Anyone got experience with "protocol buffers" or DFDL (for generation of the message (de)serialization code)? Tue, 15 Jan, 16:33
GitBox [GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 18:05
GitBox [GitHub] ottobackwards commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 19:44
GitBox [GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 19:48
GitBox [GitHub] JulianFeinauer commented on issue #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 20:34
GitBox [GitHub] JulianFeinauer merged pull request #43: S7 fix of array and String acquirement Tue, 15 Jan, 20:39
Julian Feinauer Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 16 Jan, 07:09
Christofer Dutz Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Wed, 16 Jan, 08:18
Christofer Dutz Added a new "development" profile -> Please activate during development Wed, 16 Jan, 08:43
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/features%2Fscraper-jmx-support [features/scraper-jmx-support] [4]' Wed, 16 Jan, 12:00
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [139]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:27
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [140]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:32
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [141]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:41
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [142]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:44
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [143]' Wed, 16 Jan, 15:56
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [144]' Wed, 16 Jan, 16:42
Justin Mclean Trouble building on OSX Wed, 16 Jan, 19:56
GitBox [GitHub] timbo2k opened a new pull request #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:17
Christofer Dutz Re: Trouble building on OSX Wed, 16 Jan, 20:18
GitBox [GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:27
GitBox [GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:32
Justin Mclean Re: Trouble building on OSX Wed, 16 Jan, 20:39
GitBox [GitHub] chrisdutz commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:40
GitBox [GitHub] chrisdutz merged pull request #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:42
GitBox [GitHub] timbo2k commented on issue #44: S7: changed byteLength and blockNumber from short to int Wed, 16 Jan, 20:42
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-UNSTABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [147]' Wed, 16 Jan, 20:57
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [148]' Wed, 16 Jan, 21:35
Christofer Dutz Re: Time for a new release 0.3.0? Thu, 17 Jan, 08:14
Christofer Dutz Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Thu, 17 Jan, 08:59
Christofer Dutz Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 10:07
Christofer Dutz Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 10:33
Julian Feinauer Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 11:17
Christofer Dutz Re: Trouble building on OSX Thu, 17 Jan, 11:59
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [154]' Thu, 17 Jan, 14:16
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [155]' Thu, 17 Jan, 14:27
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [156]' Thu, 17 Jan, 14:40
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [157]' Thu, 17 Jan, 15:25
Justin Mclean Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Thu, 17 Jan, 17:42
Christofer Dutz Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Thu, 17 Jan, 21:30
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]' Thu, 17 Jan, 22:35
Christofer Dutz Re: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]' Fri, 18 Jan, 06:22
Julian Feinauer Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Fri, 18 Jan, 06:59
Julian Feinauer Meetup or Code-Retreat Fri, 18 Jan, 08:30
Christofer Dutz New CVE Check plugin (WAS: [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [159]') Fri, 18 Jan, 08:31
Christofer Dutz Re: Scraper tests failing on Windows machines ... Fri, 18 Jan, 08:50
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [160]' Fri, 18 Jan, 09:14
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [162]' Fri, 18 Jan, 09:41
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [161]' Fri, 18 Jan, 09:53
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-FAILURE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [164]' Fri, 18 Jan, 10:21
Apache Jenkins Server [BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [163]' Fri, 18 Jan, 10:36
Message list1 · 2 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jun 201979
May 2019231
Apr 2019232
Mar 2019272
Feb 2019116
Jan 2019170
Dec 201895
Nov 2018116
Oct 2018162
Sep 2018223
Aug 2018235
Jul 201844
Jun 201823
May 201821
Apr 201819
Mar 201851
Feb 2018136
Jan 2018109
Dec 201775