Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-pivot-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30149 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 13:53:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 13:53:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 5135 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 13:53:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-pivot-user-archive@pivot.apache.org Received: (qmail 5115 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 13:53:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@pivot.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@pivot.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@pivot.apache.org Received: (qmail 5107 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 13:53:48 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:53:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=AWL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.67.31.29] (HELO smtprelay02.ispgateway.de) (80.67.31.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:53:40 +0000 Received: from [80.67.16.114] (helo=localhost) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1O2PVO-00047d-4T for user@pivot.apache.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:53:18 +0200 Received: from 195.243.208.50 ([195.243.208.50]) by www.premium-webmail.de (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:53:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20100415155318.19634tkh365v2ulw@www.premium-webmail.de> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:53:18 +0200 From: Dirk =?iso-8859-1?b?TfZiaXVz?= To: user@pivot.apache.org Subject: Re: Help needed testing text rendering References: <20100415104537.19796btl726zrls0@www.premium-webmail.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Dynamic Internet Messaging Program (DIMP) H3 (1.1.2) X-Originating-IP: 195.243.208.50 X-Df-Sender: 110773 Looks very good. Looks just the same as with my patch. Fonts are rendered with subpixel rendering. Bold fonts look clear, not blurred. No difference in the display of TextArea and TextInput. Dirk. Greg Brown wrote: > OK - can you try viewing this page again, and let me know if the > text looks right to you? I updated LabelSkin, TextAreaSkin, and > TerraTextInputSkin to use the rendering approach I used in the > sample applet (I have not updated other text-based components yet - > just want to see if I am on the right track). > > http://ixnay.biz/PIVOT-393/kitchen-sink.html > > Anyone else who wants to comment, please feel free. > > > On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:45 AM, Dirk M�bius wrote: > >> >> Hi Greg, >> >> Windows XP SP3 32bit, JRE 1.6.0-u16, dual head LCD 1280x1024 with >> ClearType on. >> >> Console output says: >> KEY_TEXT_ANTIALIASING: LCD HRGB antialiasing text mode >> KEY_FRACTIONALMETRICS: Default fractional text metrics mode >> >> The text displays nicely with subpixel rendering. It looks exactly >> the same as if the Windows system font renderer is rendering a >> Verdana font. >> >>> looks on a Mac. :-) Note that you may need to resize the browser >>> window - for some reason, the text looks smudgy when I first load >>> it, but once it is repainted it draws correctly >> >> I didn't see that. It displays fine on first load. >> >> I attached a screenshot: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12441806/text-test-winxp-java1.6.0.16-cleartype.jpg >> >> Regards, >> Dirk. >> >> >> > > -- Dirk M�bius