pig-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <tdunn...@veoh.com>
Subject Re: Jaql reactions?
Date Sat, 08 Dec 2007 08:27:47 GMT

This is a pretty darned important point.

My guess is that users will never be all that interested in the functional
side of any of this, but that a functional underpinning might be very useful
for the core developers and the penumbral developers because it could
provide a useful framework for expressing interior capabilities.

On 12/7/07 5:41 PM, "Benjamin Reed" <breed@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> So far 
> we haven't run into anyone here at Yahoo who has asked for a functional
> language. The cries are all for Python and Perl bindings.

View raw message