pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Adam Szita (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (PIG-3655) BinStorage and InterStorage approach to record markers is broken
Date Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:10:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3655?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16084688#comment-16084688
] 

Adam Szita commented on PIG-3655:
---------------------------------

Thanks for taking a look Koji!

Indeed this is just a test issue I will fix it in the next patch. For making it clearer I'll
introduce the following in this test:
{code}
int expectedReplicateSize = 2*(3+PigConfiguration.PIG_INTERSTORAGE_RECORDMARKER_SIZE_DEFAULT+1
+1+1)
                          + 1*(3+PigConfiguration.PIG_INTERSTORAGE_RECORDMARKER_SIZE_DEFAULT+1
+1);
{code}

 I'm also running unit tests now on trunk, so I'll wait until those are finished before attaching
a new patch (I've been running unit tests on 0.12.0 first because the customer is on that
version + E2E tests)

> BinStorage and InterStorage approach to record markers is broken
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-3655
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3655
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0, 0.3.0, 0.4.0, 0.5.0, 0.6.0, 0.7.0, 0.8.0, 0.8.1, 0.9.0, 0.9.1,
0.9.2, 0.10.0, 0.11, 0.10.1, 0.12.0, 0.11.1
>            Reporter: Jeff Plaisance
>            Assignee: Adam Szita
>         Attachments: PIG-3655.0.patch, PIG-3655.1.patch, PIG-3655.2.patch
>
>
> The way that the record readers for these storage formats seek to the first record in
an input split is to find the byte sequence 1 2 3 110 for BinStorage or 1 2 3 19-21|28-30|36-45
for InterStorage. If this sequence occurs in the data for any reason (for example the integer
16909166 stored big endian encodes to the byte sequence for BinStorage) other than to mark
the start of a tuple it can cause mysterious failures in pig jobs because the record reader
will try to decode garbage and fail.
> For this approach of using an unlikely sequence to mark record boundaries, it is important
to reduce the probability of the sequence occuring naturally in the data by ensuring that
your record marker is sufficiently long. Hadoop SequenceFile uses 128 bits for this and randomly
generates the sequence for each file (selecting a fixed, predetermined value opens up the
possibility of a mean person intentionally sending you that value). This makes it extremely
unlikely that collisions will occur. In the long run I think that pig should also be doing
this.
> As a quick fix it might be good to save the current position in the file before entering
readDatum, and if an exception is thrown seek back to the saved position and resume trying
to find the next record marker.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message