Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-pig-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-pig-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77C6718BEB for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:17:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88985 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2015 17:16:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-pig-dev-archive@pig.apache.org Received: (qmail 88941 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2015 17:16:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@pig.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@pig.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@pig.apache.org Received: (qmail 88929 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2015 17:16:21 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:16:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E7F731A2314 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:16:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.881 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.881 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sfwz6bO_BRVn for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:16:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com (mail-ig0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B7BB6204DA for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:16:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbhv6 with SMTP id hv6so22145045igb.0 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=dl8X14Hc4k+dXrUNqxeY2kUxeCyc4A44NlsykQeDHGM=; b=ylSQczIg+aADef/qc197DsODftUOCVySzGjy7PISKStLBy4CWPc1b4v8jLZykoSvvx qGMEY8JpE1eGJW8szP7P0CrXBDxIS6cw7KN8nPTBgO4jVd1tZEnVh0hSRNhEjAUXzHcW YyGV/ciNRYbLiymnqgwdrA/vpvionrBTUWIT8DYSgytI/+bUG0nEattYowRDg/DVmFca l1fgUgZu2fsg2dVURpgk7RnXKHgDPRDiJNzWJyDLl0cwnglSpfRpwOtu5YMa6ypnruKS ybzAO/nUdpo5YIZ1Em7D208gMeulFUPBr6Wr1min87Dv+iCubH9pgFBBWhLYit+3Y5J2 /Wgw== X-Received: by 10.50.114.33 with SMTP id jd1mr25964743igb.48.1444842972685; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:16:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.45.201 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:15:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Rohini Palaniswamy Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:15:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Dependency version on Kryo To: "dev@pig.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41418e24b242052213b856 --047d7b41418e24b242052213b856 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 That should be fine. We wanted to get rid of the kryo dependency in ORC and use the shaded one that hive uses. But that is in hive-exec jar which is huge and has too many other jars packed in and did not want to add that as dependency to Pig. On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Xuefu Zhang wrote: > Hi all, > > It was found in PIG-4693 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4693) > that Pig is currently dependent on Kryo 2.22. However, Spark depends on > 2.21. The two versions are not completely compatible. We tried several ways > to solve the problem but unfortunately none worked. This is mainly because > Spark doesn't give user an opportunity to provide their own kryo library > (SPARK-10910). Please refer to the full discussions in PIG-4693. > > It seems that Pig brought in kryo dependency for ORC. I'm wondering if > there is any specific reasons for kryo 2.22 and if not, whether we can > downgrade the dependency to 2.21 instead. Our initial test shows that kryo > 2.21 works just fine for ORC. This obviously solve our problem as well. > > Your input to this is greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Xuefu > --047d7b41418e24b242052213b856--