pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cheolsoo Park <piaozhe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Creating a branch for Pig on Spark (PIG-4059)
Date Tue, 26 Aug 2014 15:33:22 GMT
Ok. I will start a vote today and get back to you in few days.


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <jarcec@apache.org>
wrote:

> I would second Mayur - as he and Praveen are most familiar with all the
> changes, I would let them be the only additional branch committers. I’m
> expecting that they will review other contributor's patches similarly as
> normal committers and hence the contributors will start building Karma to
> get the “branch committership” later as well (if the branch will be around
> for that long).
>
> Jarcec
>
> On Aug 26, 2014, at 9:04 AM, Mayur Rustagi <mayur@sigmoidanalytics.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Praveen & me should be good enough for us. We will have 1-2 more folks
> > contributing from Sigmoid but we can manage by merging patches from them.
> >
> >        Initially it will be good to structure patches through us as we
> > would like to avoid breaking architecture & flow.
> >
> > Regards
> > Mayur
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhexiu@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I asked about branch committership to the infra mailing list, and here
> is
> >> the reply-
> >>
> >> Many projects have what they consider 'partial committers' that is
> >> folks who have access to specific parts of a projects svn tree. Some
> >> projects do this for GSoC participants, others as a mechanism for
> >> moving to 'full committership' within the project.
> >>
> >> Do note though that in the eyes of the ASF someone with an ICLA and an
> >> account with any permissions to commit code anywhere in the public svn
> >> tree is a committer. IOW, you would vote, have ICLAs filed, and
> >> request account creation as per normal, and then merely adjust the
> >> karma in asf-authorization-template (and or LDAP)
> >>
> >>
> >> Looks like we need to vote and follow the normal process just like any
> >> other new committer.
> >>
> >> @Praveen, Jacec,
> >> I think Mayur and Praveen from Sigmoid Analytics need branch
> committership.
> >> Will anyone else work on Pig-on-Spark? Please reply.
> >>
> >> Once I have a full list of people, I will open a vote for Pig PMCs.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Cheolsoo
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhexiu@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Additionally, I will give "branch-specific" commit permission to people
> >>> who will work on Pig on Spark (assuming it is possible).
> >>>
> >>> Please let me know if you have any objection on this too.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <
> jarcec@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> No objections from my side, thank you for creating the branch Cheolsoo
> >>>> and kudos to the Sigmoid Analytics team for the great work!
> >>>>
> >>>> Jarcec
> >>>>
> >>>> On Aug 25, 2014, at 7:14 PM, Cheolsoo Park <piaozhexiu@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi devs,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sigmoid Analytics has been working on Pig-on-Spark (PIG-4059), and
> >> they
> >>>> want to merge their work into Apache.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am going to create a "Spark" branch for them. Please let me know
if
> >>>> you have any concerns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Cheolsoo
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Mayur Rustagi
> > Ph: +1 (760) 203 3257
> > http://www.sigmoidanalytics.com
> > @mayur_rustagi <http://www.twitter.com/mayur_rustagi>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message