Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-pig-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-pig-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EBC7D165 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21783 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2012 21:16:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-pig-dev-archive@pig.apache.org Received: (qmail 21750 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2012 21:16:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@pig.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@pig.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@pig.apache.org Received: (qmail 21742 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2012 21:16:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:16:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cheolsoo@cloudera.com designates 209.85.219.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.49] (HELO mail-oa0-f49.google.com) (209.85.219.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:16:49 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id l10so920482oag.22 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:16:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=5ElOYQ9DE4FfueU7HgLjfG2A9ekHgLaDmzxMf/4ACnw=; b=pTEVPlcez3yIfdM3QE8UT8yGRtj5KvnAXd2tm3EV5CTahvXlAQl84Z9oFCqOnrD0b9 2MckTN3urSX3opLIdzq+ojXEz97esrPipPaZALt+OWf9mT31AaGUFPV1CMeOvphVVY2m +QmS4WFYFDBgMpmjI5aLpcfX1rozaJeO7VFeK1tRxSPeD59VbzetXq6Fb1nWOd4U39dc msHb+X6FbSBZiFwlGOtfjIU3eZ3OPGrXAiDrsWBZICKhC+1AVtyIYF39FC+oMFgSLRDk elte6H0VUH9m/B7D6sghiLBFheO53yXbFNqyqIUYx6MuiTxNqaVqVd/wpxwTvcWvk4ZI AIvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.31.129 with SMTP id a1mr25378060oei.58.1351631788936; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:16:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.22.230 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:16:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:16:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Are people ok with putting PIG-3017 into pig 11? From: Cheolsoo Park To: dev@pig.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1f596a58dab04cd4d4c98 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl9ATBIs8Onqou5uVfJm3Gv4Xl20eKb4proSM1D48301LXQ1zi+GYLMe4rVX9w1EYkRaL6F X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb1f596a58dab04cd4d4c98 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy wrote: > +1. Agree with Julien. Error on hitting Configuration's size limit is a > bug. > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Julien Le Dem wrote: > > > To me in falls in the category of bug fixes we can add to an existing > > version. > > It is not adding any feature, it is fixing a bug/issue > > It is well understood and limited to a specific area of the code. > > Julien > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Coveney > > wrote: > > > We have some scripts internally that have come up that are blocked on > > this, > > > and I can imagine as other shops continue to heavily use Pig, they may > as > > > well. It seems like an easy, non-invasive change and I already did the > > > work, but technically we've already branched. I consider it a bug fix, > > > though, since it can be a show stopper for a data scientist. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > Jon > > > --e89a8fb1f596a58dab04cd4d4c98--