pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Pig 0.11
Date Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:36:52 GMT
I think we are good to branch.
If the gem thing is not a big change, I'm ok with putting it into the
branch post-factum.

Daniel -- will you be managing this release?

D

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Russell Jurney
<russell.jurney@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm gonna test JRuby gems tomorrow, in hopes it can go in 0.11.
>
> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
>
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Julien Le Dem <julien@twitter.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll be looking into this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2925
>> Same thing, it can be added to branch + trunk
>> +1
>> Julien
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Bill Graham <billgraham@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for me.
>>>
>>> There's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2756 which tracks a few
>>> documentation issues that should block Pig 0.11, but they can also be done
>>> on the trunk and merged to the branch. Gianmarco, you can add a rank
>>> subtask there to serve as a reminder.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
>>> gdfm@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are missing some documentation on the RANK but I guess we could add
>>> that
>>>> to the branch and trunk in parallel.
>>>> All the patches I was keeping an eye on are in.
>>>>
>>>> So +1 for me.
>>>> --
>>>> Gianmarco
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcoveney@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think all of the major patches are in, no? Now it's just bug testing?
>>>>> Just wanted to touch base on where we are at with this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
>>> billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
>>>

Mime
View raw message