pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Time to branch 0.11?
Date Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:40:18 GMT
Esteban, it's in already. Remaining sub-tasks are documentation and more
testing.

D

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Esteban Gutierrez <esteban@cloudera.com>wrote:

> +1 (non-binding) and it would be awesome to see PIG-1314 in 0.11 if
> possible :-)
>
> cheers!
> esteban.
>
>
> --
> Cloudera, Inc.
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
> gdfm@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > --
> > Gianmarco
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bill Graham <billgraham@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Julien Le Dem <julien@twitter.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > sounds good to me
> > > > Julien
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvryaboy@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > Should we branch 0.11?
> > > > >
> > > > > I don't see anything major left outstanding other than Jon's
> > > SchemaTuple
> > > > > integration work (which is practically ready and can be pushed to
> > both
> > > a
> > > > > branch and trunk), just a few bug fixes here and there.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to branch before merging in Prasanth's CUBE operator work,
> > > since
> > > > > that's a lot of new code we would want to settle down before
> > releasing,
> > > > and
> > > > > should therefore go into 0.12 (in my opinion).
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Dmitriy
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me
> > at
> > > billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message