pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eateban Gutierrez <este...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: Time to branch 0.11?
Date Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:17:42 GMT

Excellent Dmitriy! Thanks for the info!

cheers!
esteban.


On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvryaboy@gmail.com> wrote:

> Esteban, it's in already. Remaining sub-tasks are documentation and more
> testing.
> 
> D
> 
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Esteban Gutierrez <esteban@cloudera.com>wrote:
> 
>> +1 (non-binding) and it would be awesome to see PIG-1314 in 0.11 if
>> possible :-)
>> 
>> cheers!
>> esteban.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Cloudera, Inc.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
>> gdfm@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Gianmarco
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bill Graham <billgraham@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Julien Le Dem <julien@twitter.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> sounds good to me
>>>>> Julien
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvryaboy@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>> Should we branch 0.11?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I don't see anything major left outstanding other than Jon's
>>>> SchemaTuple
>>>>>> integration work (which is practically ready and can be pushed to
>>> both
>>>> a
>>>>>> branch and trunk), just a few bug fixes here and there.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'd like to branch before merging in Prasanth's CUBE operator work,
>>>> since
>>>>>> that's a lot of new code we would want to settle down before
>>> releasing,
>>>>> and
>>>>>> should therefore go into 0.12 (in my opinion).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Dmitriy
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me
>>> at
>>>> billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
>> 

Mime
View raw message