pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jon Coveney <jcove...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What outstanding patches are must haves for 0.10? (path to a RC theater)
Date Thu, 05 Apr 2012 04:34:42 GMT
I think we got everything important in. Am excited

On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Daniel Dai <daijy@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Is everything ready now? Can we start the release process?
> 
> Daniel
> 
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Alan Gates <gates@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Sure, that's fine.
>> 
>> Alan.
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
>> 
>>> I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most
>>> testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give
>>> true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking.
>>> 
>>> Sound ok?
>>> 
>>> 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <gates@hortonworks.com>
>>> 
>>>> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day,
>>>> or they don't go in.  Otherwise this time next week there will be another
>>>> set of patches people would like to see.  I'd say the deadline should be
>>>> 3/30 (this Friday).  That would mean we could address any final test
>>>> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week.
>>>> 
>>>> Alan.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11...
>>>>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves
>>>> (I
>>>>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the
>>>> systems
>>>>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem
>>>>> with that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can
>>>>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <daijy@hortonworks.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test
>>>>>> by ourselves.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcoveney@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds
to the
>>>> point
>>>>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the
CI server
>>>>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult
>>>> that
>>>>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty
>>>> annoying
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known
useless"
>>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <daijy@hortonworks.com>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and
some of
>>>>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make
sure all
>>>>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney <
>>>> jcoveney@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems
pretty
>>>>>> strong...
>>>>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try
and get in?
>>>>>> Looking
>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly
>>>>>> possibly
>>>>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly
seriously
>>>>>>>> left...
>>>>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test
it and
>>>>>> identify
>>>>>>>>> any bugs.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message