Mailing-List: contact dev-help@pig.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@pig.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of russell.jurney@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.177 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGD7CYUvAhvzpoDXWU6S94Ob3ngTPaUy07Ud_p=rZdvHfuzZkg@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANSvDjpm_mB3BsEHNO2DEzBhX++yCkcGPG5NS5gYYSrHUdNsyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CB90F6BB.8DB05%scott@richrelevance.com>
	<CANSvDjoCOCVEB0F-TFZSsvy2DgEYavwNak-FfbmoPfd68DhvGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<290E6DAA-A0D5-4489-B08D-04D26CB1D98C@gmail.com>
	<CAGD7CYUvAhvzpoDXWU6S94Ob3ngTPaUy07Ud_p=rZdvHfuzZkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 02:36:03 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CANSvDjp+40Me_3E0WHF+0eD8c5kLo0yAdUF1-iU9Szn=5i_2sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Making git the repo of choice for Pig?
From: Russell Jurney <russell.jurney@gmail.com>
To: dev@pig.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d646732b774504bc36381c

--0016e6d646732b774504bc36381c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Gianmarco, can you elaborate a bit on the fuzziness?

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales <
gdfm@apache.org> wrote:

> My 2 cents, based on the S4 project experience so far (they have git) is +1
> but later.
>
> The process with git is still a bit fuzzy and not fully integrated and
> standardized like the one with svn.
> I personally use git for all my dev work with Pig, but then switch to svn
> to generate the final patch. A bit cumbersome but not so bad.
>
> Switching now will generate confusion and is not that urgent in my humble
> opinion.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Gianmarco
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:27, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvryaboy@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There is a check box you check when you upload a patch. If we committed
> > without verifying you checked it, thats an unfortunate oversight.
> >
> > No, you cant send a pull request via github to apache. That's a github
> > (commercial entity) feature, not a git (open source vcs) feature.
> >
> > Yes you can post a link on a Jira and ask people for review prior to
> > submitting a formal patch.  No that's not review board or Jira
> integration.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mar 22, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Russell Jurney <russell.jurney@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > That is fine.  Only committers can merge pull requests.  Not a problem.
> > >
> > > I've never signed anything, and committers take my patches.  Works the
> > same.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> There is a legal issue as well. Uploading a patch to JIRA requires the
> > >> user to grant apache license to use the code.  A pull request from
> > github
> > >> does not.
> > >> This is all being hashed out elsewhere, none of us here are experts.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 3/22/12 2:08 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jurney@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> If there is already a trial going, the project would benefit from
> > >>> switching
> > >>> to git, as we could then (I think?) accept pull requests on github.
> >  Maybe
> > >>> not, I'm not familiar with integrating multiple gits.  Barrier of
> entry
> > >>> for
> > >>> contributing would then drop dramatically, making happy for all.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Dai <daijy@hortonworks.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> This can be done in the future but I don't see there is an urgent
> need
> > >>>> for that. I'd rather wait for Apache to standardize the process and
> we
> > >>>> can easily follow and switch, rather than become the first several
> to
> > >>>> try and solve the infrastructure problem.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Daniel
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Coveney <
> > jcoveney@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> If people don't know git or svn, they are going to have to learn
> one
> > >>>> or
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>> other if they want to work with open source projects. It might as
> > >>>> well be
> > >>>>> git, since that's where things are going.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2012/3/22 Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Apache is currently doing a trial with git as the primary repo
> using
> > >>>> the
> > >>>>>> CouchDB project.  Other projects may be able to volunteer to join
> > the
> > >>>>>> trial, I'm not sure.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> see http://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I suggest that if you are interested in this join the apache
> > >>>>>> infrastructure-dev list.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 3/21/12 9:57 PM, "Russell Jurney" <russell.jurney@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> What's the work?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvryaboy@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> All that's left is for someone to volunteer to do the work.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 PM, Russell Jurney <
> > >>>> russell.jurney@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> What do we have to do to be the first real project that uses
> git?
> > >>>>>>>>> Let's do that. Or, let's just sink svn to github.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> It will propel the project forward.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney
> > >>>>>>>>> twitter.com/rjurney
> > >>>>>>>>> russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>>>> datasyndrome.com
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:04 PM, Bill Graham <billgraham@gmail.com
> >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I think this is the tweet (lacking the entire discussion tree
> > >>>> that
> > >>>> we
> > >>>>>>>>>> had
> > >>>>>>>>>> re git) where I was pointing out that some incubator projects
> > >>>> were
> > >>>>>>>>>> using
> > >>>>>>>>>> git.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/billgraham/status/174744199407738880
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Russell Jurney
> > >>>>>>>>>> <russell.jurney@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I think this changed, and you are now allowed.  Looking for
> the
> > >>>>>>>>>>> tweets.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Alan Gates <
> gates@hortonworks.com
> > >>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK Apache still does not support git as a primary
> > >>>> repository.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> You
> > >>>>>>>>>>> can use the git mirror, which Pig does.  If this has changed
> > >>>> (or
> > >>>>>>>>>>> when it
> > >>>>>>>>>>> does), I'm +0 on changing, by which I mean I don't care which
> > >>>> we
> > >>>> use.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2012, at 11:22 PM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would anyone be opposed to doing this? I think you can
> apply
> > >>>> to
> > >>>> do
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> > >>>>>>>>>>> via
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache, no? It would be nice to make git the first class
> > >>>> citizen of
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> choice... forcing developers to use svn to work with pig is
> > >>>> just
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> another
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> barrier, imho. I thought this had been bandied about on
> > >>>> Twitter
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> like, but not sure if it's been discussed seriously on the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Would love y'all's opinions on the matter
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please
> > >>>> email
> > >>>>>>>>>> me at
> > >>>>>>>>>> billgraham@gmail.com going forward.*
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > >>> datasyndrome.com
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com
> > datasyndrome.com
> >
>


-- 
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney russell.jurney@gmail.com datasyndrome.com

--0016e6d646732b774504bc36381c--