pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>
Subject Re: What outstanding patches are must haves for 0.10? (path to a RC theater)
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:54:10 GMT
Sure, that's fine.

Alan.

On Mar 27, 2012, at 11:46 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:

> I agree, Alan, though I think we should make the deadline Monday, 4/2. Most
> testing is going to happen during the week anyway, and I'd like to give
> true believers the weekend to fix up anything that is lacking.
> 
> Sound ok?
> 
> 2012/3/27 Alan Gates <gates@hortonworks.com>
> 
>> I propose we set a deadline and say patches need to be ready by that day,
>> or they don't go in.  Otherwise this time next week there will be another
>> set of patches people would like to see.  I'd say the deadline should be
>> 3/30 (this Friday).  That would mean we could address any final test
>> failures we see and start rolling the RC next week.
>> 
>> Alan.
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:00 AM, Jonathan Coveney wrote:
>> 
>>> Bill,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for going through those tickets. I marked them all as 0.10/0.11...
>>> 2616 seems like the only critical one, and the others are nice to haves
>> (I
>>> imagine 2587and 2574 won't be super critical until we build out the
>> systems
>>> that rely on them). All of them look pretty close so I'd have no problem
>>> with that.
>>> 
>>> Hopefully tomorrow others can weigh in on their priorities. Then we can
>>> label things, work to finish them, and roll the RC.
>>> 
>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <daijy@hortonworks.com>
>>> 
>>>> Yes, but CI anyway only run unit tests, we will have to run e2e test
>>>> by ourselves.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcoveney@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Perhaps a big initiative for 0.11 could be to get the builds to the
>> point
>>>>> where flaky tests don't essentially gut the usefulness of the CI server
>>>>> (Pig 0.9 hasn't passed in 6 months, etc). I'm not sure how difficult
>> that
>>>>> would be though, and what the benefit would be. But it's pretty
>> annoying
>>>> to
>>>>> be able to wrap up a release when there are a bunch of "known useless"
>>>>> tests.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2012/3/26 Daniel Dai <daijy@hortonworks.com>
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Once PIG-2317 check in, only document patch (PIG-2601) and some of
>>>>>> Russell's patches left. Before roll up RC, we need to make sure all
>>>>>> unit tests and e2e tests pass, I can help with this.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Jonathan Coveney <
>> jcoveney@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> It's time to get serious about rolling an RC. 0.10 seems pretty
>>>> strong...
>>>>>>> are there any pressing JIRAs that people want to try and get
in?
>>>> Looking
>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> the open JIRAs with a fix labeled of 0.10 (which is admittedly
>>>> possibly
>>>>>>> incomplete), it looks like there isn't anything terribly seriously
>>>>>> left...
>>>>>>> I'd love to get the ball rolling on an RC so we can test it and
>>>> identify
>>>>>>> any bugs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message