pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Santhosh Srinivasan <...@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject RE: Pig developer meeting in February
Date Fri, 28 Jan 2011 23:35:54 GMT
I am planning to attend. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:olgan@yahoo-inc.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:58 PM
To: dev@pig.apache.org
Subject: RE: Pig developer meeting in February

I believe we have critical mass so the meeting is on!

If you have not responded yet but planning to attend, please, let me know.

Thanks,

Olga

-----Original Message-----
From: Julien Le Dem [mailto:ledemj@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:21 PM
To: dev@pig.apache.org
Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February

Me too.
Julien


On 1/27/11 4:09 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvryaboy@gmail.com> wrote:

Ok yeah I'll come :).



On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Olga Natkovich <olgan@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:

> While there is a lively discussion on this thread, I have not actually 
> gotten any responses to having the meeting with exception of 1 person :).
>
> Please, let me know by the end of the week if you are planning to attend.
> If we don't get at least a few more responses I suggest we postpone 
> the meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Olga
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvryaboy@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:04 PM
> To: dev@pig.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February
>
> Right, we do partition filtering, but not true predicate pushdown.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Daniel Dai <jianyong@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Are you talking about LoadMetadata.setPartitionFilter?
> > PartitionFilterOptimizer will do that.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote:
> >
> >> I may be wrong but I think predicate pushdown is designed for, but 
> >> not actually implemented in the current LoadPushdown interface (you 
> >> can only push projections). If I am wrong, that's great.. but if 
> >> not, that would
> be
> >> an important feature to add, as people are trying to connect Pig to 
> >> "smart"
> >> storage systems like rdbmses, HBase, and Cassandra more and more.  
> >> I
> think
> >> we only kind of simulate this with partition keys info, which is 
> >> not always sufficient
> >>
> >> D
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Le Dem 
> >> <ledemj@yahoo-inc.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> If making Pig Thread safe (i.e.: two threads running a different 
> >>> pig
> >>> script) is important then we need to change some of the APIs from
> static
> >>> singleton access to a dependency injection pattern.
> >>> In that case, this should probably be done before 1.0 For example: 
> >>> UDFContext should be passed to the UDF after construction (similar 
> >>> to the SevrletContext in Servlet or the way Hadoop passes the 
> >>> context to tasks) Also a clearly separated API that does not 
> >>> depend on the Pig implementation would help.
> >>> For example UDFContext is in org.apache.pig.impl.util when it 
> >>> would be better in org.apache.pig.api (Or at least an interface 
> >>> defining it)
> >>>
> >>> Julien
> >>>
> >>> On 1/24/11 10:14 AM, "Olga Natkovich" <olgan@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Guys,
> >>>
> >>> I think it is time for us to have another meeting. Yahoo would be 
> >>> happy to host if this works for everybody. How about Wednesday, 
> >>> 2/9 4-6 pm.
> >>> Please,
> >>> let us know if you are planning to attend and if the date/time 
> >>> works
> for
> >>> you.
> >>>
> >>> Things that come to mind to discuss and as always feel free to 
> >>> suggest
> >>> others:
> >>>
> >>> -          Error handling proposal - this might be easier to finalize
> >>> face-to-face
> >>> -          Pig 0.9 plan
> >>> -          Pig Roadmap beyond 0.9
> >>> o        What do we want to do in Pig.next?
> >>> o        Are we ready for Pig 1.0
> >>>
> >>> Olga
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>


Mime
View raw message