pig-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (PIG-888) Pig do not pass udf to the backend in some situation
Date Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:41:14 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731816#action_12731816
] 

Hadoop QA commented on PIG-888:
-------------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12413622/PIG-888-1.patch
  against trunk revision 793750.

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    -1 tests included.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
                        Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    -1 javac.  The applied patch generated 255 javac compiler warnings (more than the trunk's
current 254 warnings).

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit
warnings.

    -1 core tests.  The patch failed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-minerva.apache.org/128/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-minerva.apache.org/128/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-minerva.apache.org/128/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Pig do not pass udf to the backend in some situation
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-888
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: impl
>    Affects Versions: 0.3.0
>            Reporter: Daniel Dai
>            Assignee: Daniel Dai
>             Fix For: 0.4.0
>
>         Attachments: PIG-888-1.patch, PIG-888-2.patch
>
>
> If we use udf and do not use register, in some situation backend will complain that it
cannot resolve class. For example, the following script do not work.
> A = load '1.txt' using udf1();
> B = load '2.txt';
> C = join A by $0, B by $0;

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message