From dev-return-61649-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@phoenix.apache.org Fri Jul 10 17:51:02 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 12B97180663 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:51:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 93574 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2020 17:51:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 93546 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2020 17:51:01 -0000 Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (HELO mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:51:01 +0000 Received: from jira-he-de.apache.org (static.172.67.40.188.clients.your-server.de [188.40.67.172]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8A02240AEA for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-he-de.apache.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jira-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0CC38780280 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:51:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Lars Hofhansl (Jira)" To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-6000) Client side DELETEs should use local indexes for filtering MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 Lars Hofhansl created PHOENIX-6000: -------------------------------------- Summary: Client side DELETEs should use local indexes for filtering Key: PHOENIX-6000 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6000 Project: Phoenix Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Lars Hofhansl I just noticed that client side DELETEs do not use local indexes for filtering if they do not cover all keys of all other indexes. Unless I am missing something this is not necessary, for local indexes we have the data available in the region and can fill back the uncovered column (just like we do for SELECTs) -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)