phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pedro Boado <pbo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CDH 6.X road map
Date Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:50:16 GMT
Sorry for not being on top of this for a long time. I have ongoing work in
my laptop for this task. Give me a couple of days so I can review non
working bits and push it.

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 00:45 William Shen, <willshen@marinsoftware.com> wrote:

> Mahdi,
> I did a little bit of mailinglist/JIRA-diving, and found the following
> thread, which may be helpful to get you started in addition to the two JIRA
> tickets/patches for previous work (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4372 and
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4956):
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Pedro Boado <pboado@apache.org>
> Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:17 PM
> Subject: Re: Phoenix 5.0 + Cloudera CDH 6.0 Integration
> To: <dev@phoenix.apache.org>
>
>
> Hi Curtis,
>
> As far as I am aware nobody is working on it.
>
> The approach I followed is, starting from master:
> - Change parent pom to use cloudera dependencies instead of Apache's for
> compilation
> - Make it compile (relatively easy for 4.x)
> - Make it pass tests (not that easy)
> - Once it passed, wrote the parcel module.
>
> There aren't a lot of code differences between cdh and base branches so I'd
> try to follow the same approach - basing it on changes in the current
> differences-.
>
> I really think this effort is needed to try to bring both branches again as
> close to each other as possible. Maybe some code differences are no longer
> needed because CDH is already closer to the Apache version of Hadoop 3.0
> and Hbase 2.0 than it was when I did the migration.
>
> Hope it helps,
> Pedro.
>
> On 14 Sep 2018 04:57, "Curtis Howard" <curtis.james.howard@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there anyone working towards Phoenix 5.0 / Cloudera (CDH) 6.0
> integration at this point?  I could not find any related JIRA for this
> after a quick search, and wanted to check here first before adding one.
>
> If I were to attempt this myself, is there a suggested approach?  I can see
> from previous 4.x-cdh5.* branches supporting these releases that the
> changes for PHOENIX-4372 (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4372
> )
> move the builds to CDH dependencies - for example:
>
> https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/024f0f22a5929da6f095dc0025b8e899e2f0c47b
>
> Would following the pattern of that commit (or attempting a cherry-pick)
> onto the the v5.0.0-HBase-2.0 tagged release (
> https://github.com/apache/phoenix/tree/v5.0.0-HBase-2.0) be a reasonable
> starting point?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Curtis
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:28 PM William Shen <willshen@marinsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Same here. Would love to help with adding more CDH versions, if someone
> > can help guide us on how to best go about it based on the current cdh
> > branches.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:10 PM Mahdi Salarkia <msalarkia@box.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >> Is there a plan to release a Hbase-2.0-CDH (Cloudera 6.X) compatible
> >> version of Phoenix anytime soon?
> >> I can see Phoenix currently supports older versions of CDH (5.11, ...)
> but
> >> doesn't seem to be much work being done for the version 6.
> >> P.S : I'll be happy to help given instructions to help build the CDH 6.X
> >> version
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Mehdi
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message