From dev-return-54072-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@phoenix.apache.org Thu Sep 27 00:18:30 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 13E74180675 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 17117 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2018 22:18:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 16879 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2018 22:18:28 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:18:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1C17B1808E5 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:18:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.889 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FFk1lFOLhMUQ for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vs1-f53.google.com (mail-vs1-f53.google.com [209.85.217.53]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A03AB5F197 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 22:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vs1-f53.google.com with SMTP id d1-v6so354985vsm.6 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:18:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ljvlv4DY3eSQlFBZrMNVUKLgqxYQSmOITj7fsfutx3E=; b=EgkJiAECcio7y0fIYFU3xWSlSUXjM3npaAUiTYX/WGFCdT7wgdUgPJUiw0zNAJkEcy cpVJoEi6BEw8C13MXZrBF8QXwKFZMrbJmIT9FY2jmiXY8Gr54jtuMGLdr+//NYQ2fxuu HNb/AqnO9X8Fj2cjI8B5LShGirgBHhd2f5iYKgJ8oEymEFhR8Fux4MgDJ3x3l7ASsdmP Fj22OYP3nUOGQnytp+lC2NvzI7UPdOEGW1hUYKcdDZJHami/5SVU3w48oPr2zgq+1NA6 41O6tub3Ux+Y/RLLUeVL9zgMdA0Xp2vpLufKj7gydNJjeLoCP5P8EbArSLCgU0/XxYkh 1G6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ljvlv4DY3eSQlFBZrMNVUKLgqxYQSmOITj7fsfutx3E=; b=Me4b5e1XcigY6R1BzV1V1tqwpU4tp0o/dTrBuKBaejaydW1vdeBNl3YnSdtee8lRZK MYzknwh6jA15iwssHcK2A3nUDq6EcIXscTdmiNEzzpBJl8dqkhixy+wm8t2mCtS/QFdP SCx8Pspaw/kL4icjPj0Mi1f7EHN+t68PQHCWlitFaPYmtU1+qVpEUXWPAX4BRoyLa0qg ZWP6FSNfI3gvtXn7baTcQUewkqQ0HH1EbXoY0MkQDkftqJrkt2SQocvDKY6Fe1aCjOEp RWnTpx8Go+co6NasHwKsx4wreM76Yy4LRPU1j84v8ZMbBK7iRRsyBAp6FDQricN5yzTV KE8g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfognROAPg0+0oxbrKWzGr1vewYwvlx4Br4R0V+4oliMA3+pFyhOv NqAVqsBcx5AMK9UquFkxYKGrR5VfarYEb9gfZvtD/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62JycDa2C3LYbhCOMdFLfdufZf4Do9NQb+vgrf4FJiWswB5INiKAQcNcBEoxXdezo6kq/drKbAXd0qFTB79Uxc= X-Received: by 2002:a67:a9d8:: with SMTP id m85-v6mr2529001vsh.59.1538000304512; Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:18:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Vincent Poon Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:18:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next 5.x release? To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d0a2430576cd9920" --000000000000d0a2430576cd9920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The 5.0.0 release apparently was an 'alpha'. I think we should do a 5.0.1 which can work with HBase 2.0.2 and remove the 'alpha'. 5.0 has feature parity with 4.14. 5.1 would have feature parity with 4.15, the main addition being splittable syscat On a sidenote, I've been planning a 4.14.1 release but was waiting for the CDH builds. It looks like CDH branches are no longer being maintained so I think I can just move forward with that. (btw we should clean those up) If noone else is doing it, I can try doing the 5.0.1 release concurrently. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:01 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > If possible please continue to release for one or more of the HBase 1.x > code lines. I have a feeling the HBase 1.xes will be in production for a > long time yet. > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 11:42 AM Thomas D'Silva > wrote: > > > Would we also release 4.15, or just a new 5.x release to support HBase > > 2.0.1/2.0.2 ? PHOENIX-3534 has a few follow-up JIRAs that are needed for > > splittable system catalog. > > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > > > On the user@phoenix list, Francis pointed out how Phoenix 5.0.0 only > > > works with HBase 2.0.0 and not 2.0.1 or 2.0.2. This is pretty bad given > > the > > > big fixes that went in since 2.0.0. > > > > > > What do folks think about a new 5.x release? Is it worthwhile to bring > > > back a reduced set of commits and make a 5.0.1? Or just release a 5.1.0 > > and > > > ask people to move to that instead? > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk > --000000000000d0a2430576cd9920--