phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] stop minor releases for 0.98 and 1.1
Date Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:08:11 GMT
Also +1

Do that after the release? Or before?

On 6/12/18 11:55 AM, James Taylor wrote:
> Somewhat orthogonal, but we should move master to a new 4.x-HBase-1.4
> branch and make 5.x the master branch.
> 
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:31 AM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> I think HBase 1.2 is soon to be dropped as well (maybe after 1.2.7, but
>> I might be inventing that). I'm also not so sure about the value behind
>> a 1.3 release either (I think Andrew's 1.4 branch is much more relevant).
>>
>> Getting to and HBase 1.4 and HBase 2.x sounds ideal to me (hopefully, we
>> can avoid a 2.0 and 2.1 schism...), and whatever CDH stuff Pedro wants
>> to support.
>>
>> On 6/11/18 9:47 PM, James Taylor wrote:
>>> It feels like we're trying to maintain too many branches. Both HBase 0.98
>>> and 1.1 have been EOLed. To ease the burden on devs, how about we stop
>>> maintaining the 4.x-HBase-0.98 and 4.x-HBase-1.1 branches? An RM can
>> always
>>> step up if need be to do a patch release from the 4.14 branches.
>>>
>>> Also, how about the 1.2 branch? If we kept the 4.x-cdh5.11 branch, do we
>>> need the 4.x-HBase-1.2 branch?
>>>
>>> It'd be good if this was decided prior to the biggish splittable system
>>> catalog work (PHOENIX-3534) and omid transaction integration
>> (PHOENIX-3623).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> James
>>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message