phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] 5.0.0-beta release before month's end?
Date Thu, 18 Jan 2018 21:03:18 GMT
Awesome! That's great work!!

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:

> Hah, funny you should ask! I was just thinking that I should send out a
> note.
>
> * Rajeshbabu and Sergey are trying to track down a nasty issue that the
> IndexScrutiny tool has caught where there are dangling index records
> (PHOENIX-4534)
> * Rajeshbabu is also looking into some local index failures
> * Ankit has done some testing of the phoenix-hive integration, I think
> phoenix-spark is also looking OK
>
> Last I chatted with folks, they were seeing >90% pass rate of the test
> suite which seems pretty good to me. My plan was to work on a beta release
> soon now that we have a beta from HBase. Things are generally functional as
> of now -- I think getting it into the hands of folks to get more people
> poking it would be great.
>
> Maybe rc0 next week?
>
> - Josh
>
>
> On 1/18/18 1:11 PM, James Taylor wrote:
>
>> How are things looking with the 5.0.0 alpha/beta on HBase 2.x?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Good point. Perhaps "alpha" would be a better label?
>>>
>>> IIUC, the issue is that we need the HBase release, and then a Tephra
>>> release, and then we can get Tephra fixed for Phoenix5. Perhaps Ankit can
>>> provide some more color to the situation.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/4/18 12:07 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
>>>
>>> Isn't Tephra integration mandatory for transaction support? What happens
>>>> to
>>>> a user who has TRANSACTIONAL=true tables when they upgrade? This can't
>>>> really fail gracefully. I guess transaction support is still marked
>>>> 'beta',
>>>> but still, this would be a regression of functionality in "base
>>>> Phoenix".
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:34 AM Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Talked to Rajeshbabu and Ankit offline this morning.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like there are a few integration points which are still lacking:
>>>>>
>>>>> * phoenix-hive: PHOENIX-4423
>>>>> * phoenix-spark: untested (probably broken against newest Spark)
>>>>> * phoenix-kafka: untested (probably broken against newest Kafka -- see
>>>>> PHOENIX-4515 PHOENIX-4516)
>>>>> * Tephra integration: Needs a new release of Tephra with some fixes
>>>>> Ankit helped with.
>>>>>
>>>>> I plan to not consider these 5.0.0-alpha/beta release blockers, we'll
>>>>> just call those out which we don't get tested/fixed.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/2/18 1:08 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Happy New Year folks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to test the waters: what do people think about trying to
get
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> 5.0.0 "beta" release out to the community before the end of January?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HBase is doing the same right now with 2.0.0. My thinking is that
if
>>>>>> things are stable "enough", getting a base for people to use a 5.0
>>>>>> Phoenix release more easily, we can catch more bugs and get a better
>>>>>> product out the door.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts/concerns? I'm happy to RM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message