phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Taylor (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4229) Parent-Child linking rows in System.Catalog break tenant view replication
Date Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:36:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4229?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16188479#comment-16188479
] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-4229:
---------------------------------------

The identification of the child link cell is straightforward and easily translatable to the
parent link cell. No state outside of the cell would be required as far as I can tell.

> Parent-Child linking rows in System.Catalog break tenant view replication
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4229
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4229
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.11.0, 4.12.0
>            Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>
> PHOENIX-2051 introduced new Parent-Child linking rows to System.Catalog that speed up
view deletion. Unfortunately, this breaks assumptions in PHOENIX-3639, which gives a way to
replicate tenant views from one cluster to another. (It assumes that all the metadata for
a tenant view is owned by the tenant -- the linking rows are not.) 
> PHOENIX-3639 was a workaround in the first place to the more fundamental design problem
that Phoenix places the metadata for both table schemas -- which should never be replicated
-- in the same table and column family as the metadata for tenant views, which should be replicated.

> Note that the linking rows also make it more difficult to ever split these two datasets
apart, as proposed in PHOENIX-3520.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message