phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4198) Remove the need for users to have access to the Phoenix SYSTEM tables to create tables
Date Tue, 31 Oct 2017 19:35:00 GMT


Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-4198:

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
  against master branch at commit 54a8f27304908f2259109eb230a2d3f261c2270a.
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12895021

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:red}-1 tests included{color}.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified
                        Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
                        Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of
javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number
of release audit warnings.

    {color:red}-1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch introduces the following lines longer than
    +    final UserGroupInformation superUser = UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting(SUPERUSER,
new String[0]);
+    final UserGroupInformation superUser2 = UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting("superuser",
new String[0]);
+    final UserGroupInformation regularUser = UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting("user",
 new String[0]);
+    final UserGroupInformation groupUser = UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting("user2",
new String[] { GROUP_SYSTEM_ACCESS });
+    final UserGroupInformation unprivilegedUser = UserGroupInformation.createUserForTesting("unprivilegedUser",
+        config.set("hbase.regionserver.wal.codec", "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.wal.IndexedWALEditCodec");
+                grantPermissions(regularUser.getShortUserName(), PHOENIX_NAMESPACE_MAPPED_SYSTEM_TABLES,
+                grantPermissions(unprivilegedUser.getShortUserName(), PHOENIX_NAMESPACE_MAPPED_SYSTEM_TABLES,
+                grantPermissions(AuthUtil.toGroupEntry(GROUP_SYSTEM_ACCESS), PHOENIX_NAMESPACE_MAPPED_SYSTEM_TABLES,
+                grantPermissions(regularUser.getShortUserName(), Collections.singleton("SYSTEM:SEQUENCE"),

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in .

Test results:
Console output:

This message is automatically generated.

> Remove the need for users to have access to the Phoenix SYSTEM tables to create tables
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4198
>                 URL:
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ankit Singhal
>            Assignee: Ankit Singhal
>              Labels: namespaces, security
>             Fix For: 4.13.0
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-4198.patch, PHOENIX-4198_v2.patch, PHOENIX-4198_v3.patch,
PHOENIX-4198_v4.patch, PHOENIX-4198_v5.patch, PHOENIX-4198_v6.patch, PHOENIX-4198_v7.patch
> Problem statement:-
> A user who doesn't have access to a table should also not be able to modify  Phoenix
Metadata. Currently, every user required to have a write permission to SYSTEM tables which
is a security concern as they can create/alter/drop/corrupt meta data of any other table without
proper access to the corresponding physical tables.
> [~devaraj] recommended a solution as below.
> 1. A coprocessor endpoint would be implemented and all write accesses to the catalog
table would have to necessarily go through that. The 'hbase' user would own that table. Today,
there is MetaDataEndpointImpl that's run on the RS where the catalog is hosted, and that could
be enhanced to serve the purpose we need.
> 2. The regionserver hosting the catalog table would do the needful for all catalog updates
- creating the mutations as needed, that is.
> 3. The coprocessor endpoint could use Ranger to do necessary authorization checks before
updating the catalog table. So for example, if a user doesn't have authorization to create
a table in a certain namespace, or update the schema, etc., it can reject such requests outright.
Only after successful validations, does it perform the operations (physical operations to
do with creating the table, and updating the catalog table with the necessary mutations).
> 4. In essence, the code that implements dealing with DDLs, would be hosted in the catalog
table endpoint. The client code would be really thin, and it would just invoke the endpoint
with the necessary info. The additional thing that needs to be done in the endpoint is the
validation of authorization to prevent unauthorized users from making changes to someone else's
tables/schemas/etc. For example, one should be able to create a view on a table if he has
read access on the base table. That mutation on the catalog table would be permitted. For
changing the schema (adding a new column for example), the said user would need write permission
on the table... etc etc.
> Thanks [~elserj] for the write-up.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message