Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BAD200D16 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 04:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A14F41609E9; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E44361609BB for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 04:18:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 98226 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2017 02:18:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 98215 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2017 02:18:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7A41D182B8F for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I3jQlHswJ8dW for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5129C5FBC6 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6CB03E0D58 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2561B24232 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "Josh Elser (JIRA)" To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-4224) Automatic resending cache for HashJoin doesn't work when cache has expired on server side MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 02:18:10 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16180098#comment-16180098 ] Josh Elser commented on PHOENIX-4224: ------------------------------------- bq. Playing with different scenarios for large joins I see that in some cases it may be useful and the query would return result instead of failing. In other hands it's more preferable if we fail quickly, letting user know that the cache TTL should be adjusted. Oof. That's rough. I'm trying to come up with what the "bandaid" fix would be (to avoid a revert and not block 4.12). Maybe fail quickly with a good error message? bq. Working on the fix where we keep tracking when the cache has been sent to the servers, so we will be able to separate the cases when it was expired from the cases when it was never sent ( due the region movement across the region servers). You close to this kind of fix? Should 4.12 wait for it? (half a question for Sergey, half for James) > Automatic resending cache for HashJoin doesn't work when cache has expired on server side > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: PHOENIX-4224 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4224 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 4.12.0 > Reporter: Sergey Soldatov > Assignee: Sergey Soldatov > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 4.12.0 > > > The problem occurs when the cache has expired on server side and client want to resend it. This problem has been introduced in PHOENIX-4010. Actual result in this case is that client doesn't send the cache because of the following check: > {noformat} > if (cache.addServer(tableRegionLocation) ... )) { > success = addServerCache(table, startkeyOfRegion, pTable, cacheId, cache.getCachePtr(), cacheFactory, txState); > } > {noformat} > Since the region location hasn't been changed, we actually don't send cache again, but produce new scanner which will fail with the same error and client will fall to recursion. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)