Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2D6200CF8 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CDC2C169A0A; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 31566169A0C for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 10671 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2017 17:54:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@phoenix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@phoenix.apache.org Received: (qmail 10660 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2017 17:54:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5C685C1AB7 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9meYZgvAst8y for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 618215FD38 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F26ABE06BD for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id D52E32414F for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "James Taylor (JIRA)" To: dev@phoenix.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Reopened] (PHOENIX-418) Support approximate COUNT DISTINCT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:54:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor reopened PHOENIX-418: ---------------------------------- > Support approximate COUNT DISTINCT > ---------------------------------- > > Key: PHOENIX-418 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-418 > Project: Phoenix > Issue Type: Task > Reporter: James Taylor > Assignee: Ethan Wang > Labels: gsoc2016 > Fix For: 4.12.0 > > Attachments: PHOENIX-418-v1.patch, PHOENIX-418-v2.patch, PHOENIX-418-v3.patch, PHOENIX-418-v4.patch, PHOENIX-418-v5.patch, PHOENIX-418-v6.patch > > > Support an "approximation" of count distinct to prevent having to hold on to all distinct values (since this will not scale well when the number of distinct values is huge). The Apache Drill folks have had some interesting discussions on this [here](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201306.mbox/%3CJIRA.12650169.1369931282407.88049.1370645900553%40arcas%3E). They recommend using [Welford's method](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithms_for_calculating_variance_Online_algorithm). I'm open to having a config option that uses exact versus approximate. I don't have experience implementing an approximate implementation, so I'm not sure how much state is required to keep on the server and return to the client (other than realizing it'd be much less that returning all distinct values and their counts). > Update: > Syntax of using approximate count distinct as: > select APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT(name) from person > select APPROX_COUNT_DISTINCT(address||name) from person > It is equivalent of Select COUNT(DISTINCT ID) from person. Implemented using hyperloglog, see discuss below. > Source code patch link below, co-authorred with [~swapna] > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commitdiff;h=d6381afc3af976ccdbb874d4458ea17b1e8a1d32 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)