phoenix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ethan Wang (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-418) Support approximate COUNT DISTINCT
Date Mon, 28 Aug 2017 23:38:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Ethan Wang updated PHOENIX-418:
-------------------------------
    Description: 
Support an "approximation" of count distinct to prevent having to hold on to all distinct
values (since this will not scale well when the number of distinct values is huge). The Apache
Drill folks have had some interesting discussions on this [here](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201306.mbox/%3CJIRA.12650169.1369931282407.88049.1370645900553%40arcas%3E).
They recommend using  [Welford's method](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithms_for_calculating_variance_Online_algorithm).
I'm open to having a config option that uses exact versus approximate. I don't have experience
implementing an approximate implementation, so I'm not sure how much state is required to
keep on the server and return to the client (other than realizing it'd be much less that returning
all distinct values and their counts).

Updated:
Syntax of using approximate count distinct as:


https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commitdiff;h=d6381afc3af976ccdbb874d4458ea17b1e8a1d32

  was:Support an "approximation" of count distinct to prevent having to hold on to all distinct
values (since this will not scale well when the number of distinct values is huge). The Apache
Drill folks have had some interesting discussions on this [here](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201306.mbox/%3CJIRA.12650169.1369931282407.88049.1370645900553%40arcas%3E).
They recommend using  [Welford's method](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithms_for_calculating_variance_Online_algorithm).
I'm open to having a config option that uses exact versus approximate. I don't have experience
implementing an approximate implementation, so I'm not sure how much state is required to
keep on the server and return to the client (other than realizing it'd be much less that returning
all distinct values and their counts).


> Support approximate COUNT DISTINCT
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-418
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-418
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: James Taylor
>            Assignee: Ethan Wang
>              Labels: gsoc2016
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-418-v1.patch, PHOENIX-418-v2.patch, PHOENIX-418-v3.patch,
PHOENIX-418-v4.patch, PHOENIX-418-v5.patch, PHOENIX-418-v6.patch
>
>
> Support an "approximation" of count distinct to prevent having to hold on to all distinct
values (since this will not scale well when the number of distinct values is huge). The Apache
Drill folks have had some interesting discussions on this [here](http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-drill-dev/201306.mbox/%3CJIRA.12650169.1369931282407.88049.1370645900553%40arcas%3E).
They recommend using  [Welford's method](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithms_for_calculating_variance_Online_algorithm).
I'm open to having a config option that uses exact versus approximate. I don't have experience
implementing an approximate implementation, so I'm not sure how much state is required to
keep on the server and return to the client (other than realizing it'd be much less that returning
all distinct values and their counts).
> Updated:
> Syntax of using approximate count distinct as:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=phoenix.git;a=commitdiff;h=d6381afc3af976ccdbb874d4458ea17b1e8a1d32



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Mime
View raw message